555 S.E.2d 781 | Ga. Ct. App. | 2001
A DeKalb County jury convicted Pedro Abonza of trafficking in cocaine. He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. He maintains that the evidence showing he was a party to the crime of selling cocaine was insufficient given his own testimony that he was present only to translate for a Spanish-speaking friend. Because we find the evidence sufficient, we affirm.
On appeal, Abonza no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.
After this exchange, Abonza and Javier got out of the truck, and Abonza removed a speaker box from behind the seat. Abonza unscrewed the speaker box and removed a plastic bag containing a hard chunky substance, which later tested positive as cocaine. Abonza held up the bag containing the cocaine, and the officer handed Abonza a bag containing cash. While Abonza was counting the money, the officer signaled the other police officers to move in for the arrest. The narcotics officer who made the buy testified that although he talked with both men during the drug sale, Abonza appeared to take the lead in the conversation.
Abonza testified at trial that he was at the scene only because his girlfriend’s brother had asked him to go along and because Javier did not speak English well. He argues that he had nothing to do with setting up the drug deal and that his mere presence at the scene as a translator is not sufficient to convict him as a party to the crime.
An appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard set out in Jackson v. Virginia.
Abonza’s position that reversal is required because he was merely a bystander at the scene of the crime is without merit. The
Intent is a question for the trier of fact and not for determination upon review by this Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Toney v. State, 225 Ga. App. 228 (483 SE2d 627) (1997).
See Blackmon v. State, 272 Ga. 858, 859 (1) (536 SE2d 148) (2000).
443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); King v. State, 213 Ga. App. 268, 269 (444 SE2d 381) (1994).
Dunn v. State, 248 Ga. App. 223, 224-225 (1) (546 SE2d 27) (2001); Norris v. State, 220 Ga. App. 87, 89 (2) (469 SE2d 214) (1996).
See Kendrick v. State, 146 Ga. App. 513, 514 (1) (b) (246 SE2d 505) (1978).