midpage

Abdullah v. StateAbdullah v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Feb 22, 1988
CR 87-139
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Hickman
Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The appellant, Zakee Kaleem Abdullah, a/k/a Robert Earl White, appeals from an order of the trial court denying a motion to set aside his 1982 convictions. We denied the appellant relief under Rule 37 in 1984. Abdullah v. State, 281 Ark. 239, 663 S.W.2d 166 (1984). The appellant is merely attempting to avoid the rule which prohibits a second Rule 37 petition. Ruiz v. State, 280 Ark. 190, 655 S.W.2d 441 (1983). Furthermore, the appellant failed to abstract the record of the hearing which was held on this petition. The fact that he represents himself does not excuse him from complying with the rules of the court. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986); Weston v. State, 265 Ark. 58, 576 S.W.2d 705 (1979).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Abdullah v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Feb 22, 1988
Citations: 744 S.W.2d 727; 294 Ark. 547; 1988 Ark. LEXIS 118; CR 87-139
Docket Number: CR 87-139
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
Log In