History
  • No items yet
midpage
Abdullah v. Contract Callers
1:20-cv-00007
S.D. Ga.
Apr 16, 2020
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Case 1:20-cv-00007-JRH-BKE Document 11 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 1

FILED U.S. OiSTRiCT COURT AUGUSTA DIV. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 ftpR | 6 II = 38 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA l erk S O. DV AUGUSTA DIVISION TEMPEST ABDULLAH, Plaintiff, CV 120-007 V. CONTRACT CALLERS, Defendant. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion and DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for failure to state a claim.

SO ORDERED this /l^^day of April, 2020, at Augusta, Georgia. JUDGE STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Case Details

Case Name: Abdullah v. Contract Callers
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Date Published: Apr 16, 2020
Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00007
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.