midpage

Shabazz v. BrownShabazz v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Mar 15, 1988
87-1704
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Nathaniel R. Jones, Ralph B. Guy Jr., Contie

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of this court ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Upon consideration, we affirm the judgment of the district court for ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍the reasons stated in the magistrate‘s report and recommendation adopted by the district court on July 14, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Plaintiff does not have a liberty interest in retaining “honor status” ‍​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‍under state law or prison policy. See Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238 (1983); Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983).

Case Details

Case Name: Abdullah S. Shabazz v. Robert Brown, David Jamrog, Robert Atherton, and Officer Steven Dwight
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 15, 1988
Citations: 842 F.2d 333; 1988 WL 23680; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3288; 87-1704
Docket Number: 87-1704
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In