History
  • No items yet
midpage
A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven
309 U.S. 638
SCOTUS
1940
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Central Land Co v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112; Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U. S. 454, 460-461; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan, 263 U. S. 444, 450.

Case Details

Case Name: A. M. Klemm & Son v. Winter Haven
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 8, 1940
Citation: 309 U.S. 638
Docket Number: No. 823
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.