140 Ga. App. 502 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1976
Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages against several defendants, common carriers, for failure to deliver goods to plaintiff in Atlanta. Defendants’ motions for directed verdict were denied. The jury returned a money verdict against one of the defendants, A. A. A. Delivery Service, but in favor of the other defendant. Defendant A. A. A. moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial which was denied. Held:
1. One of the grounds of the motion for judgment n. o. v. was the failure to prove the market value of the goods
Judgment reversed with direction.