Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about May 24, 2001, which, upon the grant of reargument, adhered to the order of
Petitioner’s motion to vacate respondent’s mechanic’s lien upon the ground that the lien had not been timely filed, was properly denied since issues of fact exist as to whether work performed at the subject premises within the statutory eight-month period was performed pursuant to the parties’ contract, or constituted warranty or repair work, or new work outside the parties’ contract (see, Lien Law § 10 [1]; Nelson v Schrank,
