86-3140 | 6th Cir. | Apr 29, 1987

817 F.2d 30" date_filed="1987-04-29" court="6th Cir." case_name="43 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1273 v. The Plain Dealer Publishing Company">817 F.2d 30

43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1273" date_filed="1987-04-29" court="6th Cir." case_name="Cleveland Newspaper Guild, Local 1 v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.">43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1273,
43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,247
CLEVELAND NEWSPAPER GUILD, LOCAL 1, NEWSPAPER GUILD,
AFL-CIO, CLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-3140.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

April 29, 1987.

George W. Palda, Berkman, Gordon, Murray & Palda, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Karen B. Newborn, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, Elliot S. Azoff, for defendant-appellee.

Prior Report: 813 F.2d 101" date_filed="1987-04-29" court="6th Cir." case_name="Cleveland Newspaper Guild--Local 1 v. The Plain Dealer Publishing Company">813 F.2d 101.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, ENGEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.