History
  • No items yet
midpage
223 A.D.2d 429
N.Y. App. Div.
1996

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered June 29, 1995, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on their first counterclaim and dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs raise triable issues of fact, including whether the alterations made by the tenant were structural, whether defendants could have reasonably withheld consent to these alterations and whether the parties acted in good faith prior to closing. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: 265 Fordham Real Estate Corp. v. Raymond Heettener Associates
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 18, 1996
Citations: 223 A.D.2d 429; 636 N.Y.S.2d 1008; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 326
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    265 Fordham Real Estate Corp. v. Raymond Heettener Associates, 223 A.D.2d 429