History
  • No items yet
midpage
2564 Co. v. D'Addario
35 Misc. 2d 176
N.Y. App. Term.
1961
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that the tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 11 separate dispossess proceedings over a period from October, 1958 to May, 1960, or one every three months, a final order in favor of the landlord should, have been granted (Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; 974 Realty Corp.v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence,. 14 Misc 2d 1070).

*177The final order in favor of tenant should he reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — IIofstadter, J. P., Tilzer and Gold, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: 2564 Co. v. D'Addario
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Nov 30, 1961
Citation: 35 Misc. 2d 176
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.