History
  • No items yet
midpage
25 A.D.3d 377
N.Y. App. Div.
2006

2365 LORILLARD CORP., Plaintiff, v ALEXANDRA KRUMSZYN et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) ALEXANDRA KRUMSZYN, Appellant, v 2365 LORILLARD CORP., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

October 21, 2004

11 A.D.3d 377 | 806 N.Y.S.2d 870

Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Howard R. Silver, J. (Supreme Court, Bronx County)

2365 LORILLARD CORP., Plaintiff, v ALEXANDRA KRUMSZYN et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) ALEXANDRA KRUMSZYN, Appellant, v 2365 LORILLARD CORP., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) [806 NYS2d 870]—

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered October 21, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of the action No. 2 defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in that action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The documentary evidence adduced by the action No. 2 defendants showed that plaintiff-appellant duly transferred the subject real property in November 1996 so as to avoid the judicial process brought against her by reason of the many serious violations issued against the premises as well as to escape imprisonment for criminal contempt. Plaintiff‘s unsupported assertion that the 1996 transfer was induced by fraud was insufficient to raise any triable issue (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 967 [1988]) Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: 2365 Lorillard Corp. v. Krumszyn
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 10, 2006
Citations: 25 A.D.3d 377; 806 N.Y.S.2d 870
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    2365 Lorillard Corp. v. Krumszyn, 25 A.D.3d 377