History
  • No items yet
midpage
220-2 East 85th St., Inc. v. Fastenberg
13 A.D.2d 724
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the action remanded to Special Term to make findings as to the disputed factual issues. The findings of the court do not adequately comply with section 440 of the Civil Practice Act, which requires the decision of the court to state the essential facts. (Hurwitz v. Hurwitz, 3 A D 2d 1009; Steel Co. of So. Cal. v. Associated Metals & Mins. Corp., 277 App. Div. 687; Mason v. Lory Dress Co., 277 App. Div. 660.) Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: 220-2 East 85th St., Inc. v. Fastenberg
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 2, 1961
Citation: 13 A.D.2d 724
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.