62 Op. Att'y Gen. 16 | Wis. Att'y Gen. | 1973
W. PATRICK DONLIN, District Attorney, Price County
You request my opinion "as to whether a trespass to an outbuilding, unauthorized and without the consent of any person lawfully upon the premises which would fit the other requirements of
In connection with such request, you have advised me as follows:
"Situations have recently developed wherein persons have, without authorization, entered outbuildings in various localities and have not entered the dwelling house of the property owner. Such entry has been without the consent of the owner of the property."
In giving you my opinion on the above-stated question, I am assuming that when you refer to the trespass therein described as one "which would fit the other requirements of
Making the above-stated assumptions, it is my opinion that the "trespass to an outbuilding" taking place under the circumstances you describe would be a violation of sec.
The word "dwelling," appearing in sec.
In sum, then, it is my opinion that the term "dwelling" used in sec.
Several matters warrant brief comment before closing this opinion.
First, it is worthy of note that no reported Wisconsin case has dealt with the meaning of "dwelling," as used in statutes such as sec.
Second, the fact that a trespass under sec.
Third, the fact that sec.
Fourth, if and when you are compelled to decide whether a given outbuilding comes within the compass of the word "dwelling," as used in sec.
RWW:JHM