Zhang v. Asian Moon Restaurant Corp.
2:20-cv-02776
E.D.N.YMar 15, 2022Background
- Plaintiff Chengcheng Zhang worked as a waiter at Asian Moon (Garden City, NY) from ~August 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019, typically six days/week, ~9.5 hours/day (≈57 hours/week).
- He was paid fixed daily amounts ($25/day → $30/day → $64/day) regardless of hours; time records were incomplete or inaccurate and tips were subject to a 7% daily deduction.
- Defendants are Asian Moon Restaurant Corp. and co-owners/operators Vickie S. Li and Sherry Li; Plaintiff alleged they controlled hiring, schedules, and pay.
- Plaintiff sued under the FLSA and NYLL for unpaid minimum and overtime wages, spread-of-hours pay, and WTPA (notice and wage-statement) violations; defendants did not answer and defaults were entered.
- Magistrate Judge Shields recommended granting default judgment and awarding wages, liquidated damages, WTPA statutory penalties, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorney’s fees and costs.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability under FLSA/NYLL (employer/enterprise status) | Zhang: Asian Moon is an enterprise and Vickie and Sherry are employers who supervised, hired/fired, set pay and schedules. | No response; default. | Court: Allegations deemed admitted on default; enterprise and individual employer liability established. |
| Unpaid minimum and overtime wages; calculation of damages | Zhang: Worked ~57 hrs/wk; daily pay resulted in underpayment of minimum and overtime; seeks back pay for statutory periods. | No response; default. | Court: Findings supported by affidavit/complaint; awards $63,030 unpaid minimum/overtime. |
| Spread-of-hours and WTPA violations (wage notice/statements) | Zhang: Worked >10-hour spreads; received inadequate wage notices and inaccurate paystubs; seeks statutory remedies. | No response; default. | Court: Awards $7,848 for spread-of-hours and statutory maximum $5,000 each for wage-notice and wage-statement violations (total $10,000). |
| Liquidated damages, prejudgment/postjudgment interest, attorneys’ fees & costs | Zhang: Requests 100% liquidated damages, pre-judgment interest on NYLL damages, post-judgment interest, and $12,930 fees + $733.50 costs. | No response; default. | Court: Awards 100% liquidated damages ($70,878), prejudgment interest $17,287.72 (through R&R) plus accrual, post-judgment interest per 28 U.S.C. § 1961, attorney’s fees $12,930, costs $733.50. |
Key Cases Cited
- Greyhound Exhibitgroup v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1992) (well-pleaded factual allegations treated as admitted on default for liability)
- Reich v. S. New England Telecomm. Corp., 121 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 1997) (employer burden to avoid liquidated damages under FLSA)
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn., 559 U.S. 542 (U.S. 2010) (lodestar as presumptively reasonable fee measure)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (U.S. 2007) (plausibility standard for pleadings)
- Lundy v. Catholic Health Sys. of Long Island Inc., 711 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 2013) (pleading requirements for overtime claims)
- Dejesus v. HF Mgmt. Servs., LLC, 726 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2013) (plaintiff must plead sufficient factual detail to infer >40 hours/week)
- Nakahata v. New York–Presbyterian Healthcare Sys., Inc., 723 F.3d 192 (2d Cir. 2013) (overtime pleading standards)
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 323 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1944) (employer must pay time-and-a-half for hours over 40)
- Carter v. Dutchess Cmty. Coll., 735 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1984) (multi-factor test for individual employer status)
