History
  • No items yet
midpage
Zaldivar v. JMJ Caterers, Inc.
166 F. Supp. 3d 310
E.D.N.Y
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Orbin Zaldivar worked as a dishwasher/food preparer at The Metropolitan (a catering business) from early 2010 until late 2013 (disputed end date) and alleges regular 12-hour shifts six days/week.
  • Zaldivar alleges a ‘‘two punch card’’ system: one card recorded the first 40 weekly hours (paid by check with tax withholding) and a second card recorded overtime hours (paid in cash at regular rate), depriving employees of overtime premium.
  • Plaintiff claims the practice applied to kitchen staff, servers, and busboys/runners and that he complained to management, who refused to pay overtime.
  • Plaintiff moved for conditional certification of an FLSA collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) on behalf of servers, busboys, and kitchen workers employed since December 28, 2012; defendants opposed, disputing allegations of overtime and the existence/application of the punch‑card scheme.
  • The court applied the Second Circuit two‑step collective‑action framework, found Plaintiff made the modest factual showing required at the first step, and granted conditional certification for the proposed collective.
  • Court ordered defendants to produce contact information (names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of employment) for potential opt‑ins and allowed limited briefing on the proposed notice content.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether plaintiffs are "similarly situated" for conditional certification under § 216(b) Zaldivar: his affidavit plus time‑card sampling and eyewitness accounts show a common unlawful pay practice (two punch cards) affecting servers, busboys, kitchen staff Defendants: disputes factual allegations (hours worked, overtime paid, existence of busboys, who worked overtime); supply time cards showing overtime paid Granted: court applied the lenient, first‑step "modest factual showing" standard and found sufficient factual nexus to conditionally certify the collective
Proper scope / job categories included in the collective Zaldivar seeks servers, busboys, kitchen workers (Dec 28, 2012–present) as all subject to the same policy Defendants sought to limit to kitchen staff only, arguing other positions couldn’t have worked overtime Rejected limit: court held differing job functions do not defeat conditional certification where a common unlawful policy is alleged
Applicable statute of limitations for notice period Zaldivar alleges willful violations and requests three‑year period; proposes opt‑in period beginning Dec 28, 2012 Defendants dispute willfulness; no focused reply on period Court applied three‑year FLSA limitations at this stage and certified claims back to March 27, 2012 but accepted plaintiff’s proposed class starting Dec 28, 2012
Scope of discoverable contact information for notice Zaldivar requests computer‑readable list including names, addresses, phones, DOBs, dates of employment Defendants did not oppose substantively Court ordered production of names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of employment; declined DOBs and SSNs absent particularized need

Key Cases Cited

  • Myers v. Hertz Corp., 624 F.3d 537 (2d Cir. 2010) (adopts two‑step analysis for FLSA collective certification and explains the "modest factual showing" standard)
  • Hoffmann‑La Roche Inc. v. Sperling, 493 U.S. 165 (1989) (district court has broad discretion over form and content of notice in collective actions)
  • Dybach v. State of Fla. Dep’t of Corrections, 942 F.2d 1562 (11th Cir. 1991) (unsupported assertions insufficient to meet FLSA collective showing)
  • Iglesias‑Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc., 239 F.R.D. 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (employees with varied positions can be similarly situated where a common policy is alleged)
  • Wraga v. Marble Lite, Inc., 2006 WL 2443554 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) (note: court relied on plaintiff affidavit and discussions with co‑workers to approve notice) (included as persuasive authority on affidavit sufficiency)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Zaldivar v. JMJ Caterers, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: Feb 26, 2016
Citation: 166 F. Supp. 3d 310
Docket Number: CV 14-924 (SJF) (AKT)
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y