Young v. Georgia Agricultural Exposition Authority
318 Ga. App. 244
Ga. Ct. App.2012Background
- Tony Young suffered injuries from two bulls at a Perry beef exposition; the trial court granted summary judgment to GAEA on Tony’s economic loss claim; this Court previously reviewed related claims against Shelby and the agency; Tony presented evidence of income from cattle embryo services and related farming activity; tax returns from 1996–1997 showed embryo income, with later years showing losses, affecting earnings; the issue is whether the evidence raises a jury question on lost earnings despite fluctuations in income and tax reporting.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a jury issue on Tony’s economic loss? | Tony presented past earnings and potential future earnings evidence. | GAEA argued the evidence was speculative and lacked ascertainable basis. | Yes, jury issue exists. |
| Can lost earnings be proven with contested tax returns? | Past earnings and embryo income suffice to show earnings capacity. | Tax returns are too uncertain to prove lost earnings. | Judgment reversed; jury to determine damages. |
Key Cases Cited
- Dossie v. Sherwood, 308 Ga. App. 185 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011) (loss of earnings proof when causation shown)
- Crosby v. Spencer, 207 Ga. App. 487 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993) (uncertainty of damages does not bar recovery when causation shown)
- Southwestern R. Co. v. Vellines, 14 Ga. App. 674 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914) (imputes earning capacity evidence when precise profits unavailable)
- Gipson v. Phillips, 232 Ga. App. 235 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998) (evidence of potential earnings can support lost profits)
- Quiktrip Corp. v. Childs, 220 Ga. App. 463 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996) (tax returns and present earnings can establish lost wages)
- Johnson County School Dist. v. Greater Savannah Lawn Care, 278 Ga. App. 110 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (lost profits generally require definite ascertainment)
- Kingston Pencil Corp. v. Jordan, 115 Ga. App. 333 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967) (lost profits must be capable of definite ascertainment)
