History
  • No items yet
midpage
834 S.E.2d 530
Va. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Yorhonda Pooler occasionally stayed overnight at Marcus Morris’s mobile home (owned by Jamal Hasan‑Bey), kept some personal items there, had a key, and helped pay utilities, but maintained a separate residence in Norfolk.
  • On February 22, 2018, Pooler and an unknown female kicked in the mobile home’s front door despite not being invited; a fight ensued in which Pooler bit L.S.; all parties eventually left in their vehicles.
  • Pooler was tried in a bench trial and convicted of assault and battery and statutory burglary (Code § 18.2‑91); sentenced to 12 months (assault) and 3 years (burglary).
  • At trial Pooler argued she resided at the mobile home and thus could not be guilty of burglary because the dwelling was not "of another" and she had permission to enter.
  • The trial court found Pooler did not reside there, lacked permission to be present that night, and that kicking in the door constituted a breaking; Pooler appealed challenging sufficiency of evidence for the burglary conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the residence was a "dwelling of another" (right to occupy) Pooler: she resided/cohabited there so it was not "of another" Commonwealth: Pooler had no possessory interest or legal right to occupy Court: Pooler had no estate or special legal right to occupy; dwelling was "of another"
Whether a "breaking" occurred (permission to enter) Pooler: had a key, personal effects, and sometimes stayed there so she had permission; no breaking Commonwealth: any permission was conditional; Morris did not invite her that night and door was kicked in (actual force) Court: evidence supported lack of permission that night and actual breaking by force; burglary element satisfied

Key Cases Cited

  • Turner v. Commonwealth, 33 Va. App. 88 (2000) (burglary protects security of another’s habitation; must be dwelling "of another")
  • Justus v. Commonwealth, 274 Va. 143 (2007) (one may not burglarize a home in which one has a right to occupy)
  • Lay v. Commonwealth, 50 Va. App. 330 (2007) ("breaking" may be actual or constructive)
  • Clarke v. Commonwealth, 66 Va. (25 Gratt.) 908 (1874) (definition of burglary requires breaking and entering of another’s house)
  • Johnson v. Commonwealth, 221 Va. 872 (1981) (slight force or pushing open a door can constitute an actual breaking)
  • Snyder v. Commonwealth, 220 Va. 792 (1980) (permission to enter negates the breaking element)
  • Jones v. Commonwealth, 279 Va. 295 (2010) (permission or authorization to enter may be negated by the entrant’s intent)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Yorhonda Milldred Pooler, s/k/a Yorhonda Mildred Pooler v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Nov 19, 2019
Citations: 834 S.E.2d 530; 71 Va. App. 214; 1786181
Docket Number: 1786181
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
Log In
    Yorhonda Milldred Pooler, s/k/a Yorhonda Mildred Pooler v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 834 S.E.2d 530