History
  • No items yet
midpage
97 A.D.3d 141
N.Y. App. Div.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff alleged the defendant repeated to a close family friend that plaintiff was gay or bisexual, harming plaintiff's relationship.
  • Supreme Court dismissed some claims but allowed slander claim to proceed, citing per se defamation for homosexual imputations.
  • Court previously followed line of Appellate Division cases treating false homosexual imputations as slander per se; those were challenged.
  • Court overrules prior cases and holds statements falsely imputing homosexuality are not defamatory per se.
  • Court cites public policy favoring acceptance of lesbians, gays and bisexuals, including Human Rights Law protections and Marriage Equality Act.
  • Case ultimately dismisses both the slander claim (due to lack of special damages) and other claims; orders dismissal of both complaint and third-party complaint.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether statements describing a person as lesbian, gay or bisexual are slander per se Plaintiff argues such statements are inherently defamatory Defendant and amici argue they are not per se defamatory Not per se defamatory
Whether special damages are required for slander when the statements are not per se Plaintiff contends damages need not be proven absent per se Defendant contends damages are required unless per se Special damages not required; claims dismissed for lack of per se basis; slander claim barred for lack of damages

Key Cases Cited

  • Liberman v. Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429 (NY 1992) (establishes four per se categories; damages presumed in per se cases)
  • Kimmerle v. New York Evening Journal, Inc., 262 NY 99 (N.Y. 1933) (defamatory meaning hinges on exposure to contempt and disgrace)
  • Bytner v. Capital Newspaper, Div. of Hearst Corp., 112 AD2d 667 (2nd Dept. 1985) (discussion of disgrace as inherent to defamation)
  • Golub v. Enquirer/Star Group, 89 NY2d 1076 (NY 1997) (recognizes defamation analysis for statements with potential defamatory connotations)
  • Matherson v. Marchello, 100 AD2d 233 (2d Dept. 1984) (formerly treated homosexuality as per se defamatory; relied on social opprobrium)
  • Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (U.S. 2003) (reaffirmed respect for private life and invalidated criminalization of homosexual conduct)
  • Tourge v. City of Albany, 285 AD2d 785 (3d Dept. 2001) (fifth per se category recognized by some Appellate Divisions prior to reconsideration)
  • Klepetko v. Reisman, 41 AD3d 551 (2d Dept. 2007) (cited as prior authority that false imputations of homosexuality could be per se)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Yonaty v. Mincolla
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 31, 2012
Citations: 97 A.D.3d 141; 945 N.Y.S.2d 774; 945 N.Y.2d 774
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In
    Yonaty v. Mincolla, 97 A.D.3d 141