History
  • No items yet
midpage
X Technologies, Inc. v. Marvin Test Systems, Inc.
719 F.3d 406
5th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • X Technologies and Geotest entered an exclusive teaming agreement to jointly pursue USAF solicitation FA8224-09-R-0104.
  • Geotest bid with Raytheon, while X Tech relied on Geotest’s data/software to complete its bid.
  • USAF amended the solicitation to full and open; Geotest won the contract.
  • X Tech sued in state court for breach of contract; Geotest removed to federal court and moved to transfer venue.
  • Jury found Geotest breached; district court awarded X Tech $336,000 plus fees; Geotest appealed on causation, prior material breach, and breach findings.
  • On appeal, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment and remanded for appellate fees.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Causation sufficiency X Tech contends evidence supports foreseeability of loss. Geotest argues Garner’s testimony forecloses causation as a matter of law. Sufficient evidence supported causation; jury could infer loss from Geotest’s breach.
Prior material breach X Tech did not breach; exclusivity limits Geotest’s teaming, not X Tech’s submissions. Geotest asserts X Tech’s separate bid breached the agreement as a material breach. X Tech did not breach under the agreement; district court did not err in directed verdict for X Tech.
Geotest breach Geotest’s teaming with Raytheon violated the exclusivity terms. Geotest contends it was a licensee, not a teammate; no breach. There was sufficient evidence the Geotest-Raytheon relationship constituted teaming; verdict supported.

Key Cases Cited

  • Mead v. Johnson Group, Inc., 615 S.W.2d 685 (Tex. 1981) (causation/foreseeability in contract damages)
  • Strakos v. Gehring, 360 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. 1962) (jury determines causation unless no factual dispute)
  • Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (Supreme Ct. 2000) (standard for evaluating evidence supporting verdict)
  • Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969) (directed verdict standard; evidentiary review)
  • Bryant v. Compass Group USA Inc., 413 F.3d 471 (5th Cir. 2005) (plainly stated standards for appellate review of verdicts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: X Technologies, Inc. v. Marvin Test Systems, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 11, 2013
Citation: 719 F.3d 406
Docket Number: 12-50230
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.