Wrenn v. District of Columbia
420 U.S. App. D.C. 309
| D.C. Cir. | 2015Background
- Appellants (District of Columbia and its Police Chief) appealed a preliminary injunction that barred enforcement of D.C.’s "good reason" requirement for concealed-carry licenses.
- The district court judge who issued the injunction was Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., a judge of the Northern District of New York sitting as a visiting judge in D.C.
- Judge Scullin had been designated to hear certain specified related matters, but his designation did not include the present case.
- The D.C. court’s calendar committee assigned the matter to Judge Scullin on the ground it was related to a case he was handling, but the Chief Justice’s designation did not encompass this particular litigation.
- The D.C. Circuit resolved the appeal on jurisdictional grounds, concluding Judge Scullin lacked authority to enter the injunction because his limited designation did not cover this case.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a visiting senior judge had authority to decide this D.C. case | Appellees (Renn) implicitly relied on the court’s assignment and de facto validity of acts | Appellants (D.C.) argued the judge lacked designation authority for this case | Judge lacked jurisdiction; decision vacated |
| Whether the de facto officer doctrine validates acts by a judge acting beyond designation | Appellees argued de facto officer doctrine should validate the injunction | Appellants contended designation limits are jurisdictional and not technical defects | De facto officer doctrine inapplicable; designation limits are jurisdictional |
| Whether a limited designation that covered related cases extends to subsequently assigned related matters | Appellees relied on related-case assignment to justify jurisdiction | Appellants said statutory designation controls, not local assignment practices | Local calendar assignment cannot cure absence of Chief Justice designation |
| Remedy for action taken without proper judicial designation | Appellees sought to uphold the injunction despite defect | Appellants sought vacatur of the injunction | Court vacated the injunction as entered by a judge acting without jurisdiction |
Key Cases Cited
- Frad v. Kelly, 302 U.S. 312 (1937) (orders issued by a visiting judge after expiration or beyond scope of designation are null)
- United States v. American-Foreign Steamship, 363 U.S. 685 (1960) (judgments must be vacated when a judge sat in violation of statutory limits)
- Nguyen v. United States, 539 U.S. 69 (2003) (discusses the de facto officer doctrine and its limits)
