History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wrenn v. District of Columbia
420 U.S. App. D.C. 309
| D.C. Cir. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellants (District of Columbia and its Police Chief) appealed a preliminary injunction that barred enforcement of D.C.’s "good reason" requirement for concealed-carry licenses.
  • The district court judge who issued the injunction was Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., a judge of the Northern District of New York sitting as a visiting judge in D.C.
  • Judge Scullin had been designated to hear certain specified related matters, but his designation did not include the present case.
  • The D.C. court’s calendar committee assigned the matter to Judge Scullin on the ground it was related to a case he was handling, but the Chief Justice’s designation did not encompass this particular litigation.
  • The D.C. Circuit resolved the appeal on jurisdictional grounds, concluding Judge Scullin lacked authority to enter the injunction because his limited designation did not cover this case.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a visiting senior judge had authority to decide this D.C. case Appellees (Renn) implicitly relied on the court’s assignment and de facto validity of acts Appellants (D.C.) argued the judge lacked designation authority for this case Judge lacked jurisdiction; decision vacated
Whether the de facto officer doctrine validates acts by a judge acting beyond designation Appellees argued de facto officer doctrine should validate the injunction Appellants contended designation limits are jurisdictional and not technical defects De facto officer doctrine inapplicable; designation limits are jurisdictional
Whether a limited designation that covered related cases extends to subsequently assigned related matters Appellees relied on related-case assignment to justify jurisdiction Appellants said statutory designation controls, not local assignment practices Local calendar assignment cannot cure absence of Chief Justice designation
Remedy for action taken without proper judicial designation Appellees sought to uphold the injunction despite defect Appellants sought vacatur of the injunction Court vacated the injunction as entered by a judge acting without jurisdiction

Key Cases Cited

  • Frad v. Kelly, 302 U.S. 312 (1937) (orders issued by a visiting judge after expiration or beyond scope of designation are null)
  • United States v. American-Foreign Steamship, 363 U.S. 685 (1960) (judgments must be vacated when a judge sat in violation of statutory limits)
  • Nguyen v. United States, 539 U.S. 69 (2003) (discusses the de facto officer doctrine and its limits)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wrenn v. District of Columbia
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Dec 15, 2015
Citation: 420 U.S. App. D.C. 309
Docket Number: 15-7057
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.