History
  • No items yet
midpage
102 F.4th 769
5th Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Joseph Work sued his former employer, Intertek Resource Solutions, for unpaid overtime and other relief, seeking to proceed as a class action.
  • Both Work and Intertek agreed an arbitration agreement governs their dispute, but disagreed on whether it permits class (collective) arbitration.
  • The arbitration agreement stated it would be administered by JAMS under its Employment Arbitration Rules and subject to its Policy on Employment Arbitration Minimum Standards.
  • Intertek moved to compel individual arbitration; Work argued that the agreement referred questions of arbitrability, including class arbitrability, to the arbitrator by incorporating the JAMS Rules.
  • The district court held the JAMS Rules incorporation clearly delegated arbitrability—including class arbitration—to the arbitrator, and denied Intertek’s motion to compel individual arbitration.
  • Intertek appealed the district court's decision.

Issues

Issue Work's Argument Intertek's Argument Held
Who decides class arbitrability Agreement delegates to arbitrator via JAMS Rules No clear delegation; should be judicially decided Arbitrator decides under clear & unmistakable rule
Incorporation of JAMS Rules Cites express contract language incorporating them "Pursuant to" is insufficient to incorporate fully JAMS Rules are clearly incorporated by reference
Ambiguity under Lamps Plus Agreement is not ambiguous; incorporates JAMS Rules Agreement is silent/ambiguous as to class procedure Agreement is unambiguous; Lamps Plus inapplicable
Scope of delegation Delegation includes class arbitrability specifically Delegation (if any) shouldn't cover class arbitration Delegation includes all arbitrability, inc. class

Key Cases Cited

  • Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 587 U.S. 176 (Supreme Court bars class arbitration without clear contractual basis)
  • Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662 (contract silence insufficient for class arbitration)
  • Cooper v. WestEnd Cap. Mgmt., L.L.C., 832 F.3d 534 (incorporating arbitration rules with delegation provision sends arbitrability to arbitrator)
  • 20/20 Communications, Inc. v. Crawford, 930 F.3d 715 (arbitration agreement incorporating rules delegates arbitrability to arbitrator)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Work v. Intertek
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 28, 2024
Citations: 102 F.4th 769; 23-20120
Docket Number: 23-20120
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    Work v. Intertek, 102 F.4th 769