Woodrow W. Nelson v. Town of Christiansburg and Starnet Insurance Company
0313173
Va. Ct. App. UOct 3, 2017Background
- Claimant (utility supervisor) routinely marked underground utility meters by reaching into ~2-foot-deep meter boxes to clip/unclip transmitters and then standing and marking lines.
- On June 24, 2015, after unclipping a transmitter while kneeling/squatting, claimant rose, twisted to his right, felt a “pop” in his back and fell; he was holding several light tools (≈11 lbs total).
- Claimant testified the position and ground were not awkward or unusually strenuous and that no environmental factor contributed; he had performed this work hundreds/thousands of times.
- Deputy commissioner and full Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission denied benefits, finding no work-related risk or hazard caused the injury; one commissioner dissented.
- Claimant appealed, arguing the manner of performing the work (kneeling/squatting and rising/turning) created an employment-specific risk akin to prior compensable cases.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether claimant's back injury "arose out of" employment under the actual-risk test | The required body positions/movements (kneeling/squatting and rising/turning while holding tools) posed a work-specific hazard not common to the public | The incident was a routine, non-peculiar act (rising/turning) with no contributing environmental factor; thus not an employment risk | Commission's finding affirmed: injury did not arise out of employment under the actual-risk test |
| Whether the workplace contained a hazard "peculiar to the work" (causal link) | Claimant relied on repetition and job-required posture to show a causal link | Employer argued no unusual, awkward, repetitive, or hazardous condition like in precedents | Court held no peculiar hazard was shown—facts distinguishable from precedent |
Key Cases Cited
- Southside Va. Training Ctr. v. Ellis, 33 Va. App. 824, 537 S.E.2d 35 (2000) (establishes that simple acts of bending/turning without other contributing factors are not compensable under the actual-risk test)
- Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc., 15 Va. App. 17, 421 S.E.2d 32 (1992) (work in a crouched position several feet off the ground created a workplace hazard peculiar to the job)
- Bassett-Walker, Inc. v. Wyatt, 26 Va. App. 87, 493 S.E.2d 384 (1997) (repetitive deep-knee bends created the critical link between employment and injury)
- Artis v. Ottenberg’s Bakers, Inc., 45 Va. App. 72, 608 S.E.2d 512 (2005) (appellate review gives deference to Commission’s factual findings if supported by credible evidence)
