History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wooden v. Division of Employment Security
341 S.W.3d 770
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Wooden was discharged January 25, 2010 by The Summit, Inc. for not picking up trash first thing in the morning; he had approximately two years’ employment as a floor technician at a nursing home.
  • The Division of Employment Security initially found Wooden not disqualified for unemployment benefits; The Summit appealed to the Appeals Tribunal.
  • The Appeals Tribunal reversed, finding the failure to pick up trash constituted misconduct connected with work.
  • The Commission affirmed the Appeals Tribunal’s decision, adopting it as its own.
  • Wooden challenged the Commission’s lack of explicit factual findings and the sufficiency of the evidence to prove misconduct; the court reverses for inadequate findings and remands for proper fact-finding.
  • Key issue is whether the Commission’s findings were sufficient to support a conclusion of misconduct and whether the evidence, given those findings, proves culpable conduct.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Were the Commission’s findings sufficient to establish misconduct? Wooden Summit No; findings lacked culpability/intent and are inadequate for review.
Did the evidence, with adequate factual findings, support misconduct? Wooden Summit Not determinable from the record; remand for explicit findings required.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dolgencorp, Inc. v. Zatorski, 134 S.W.3d 813 (Mo.App. 2004) (requires unequivocal, affirmative findings of fact for intelligent review)
  • Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. banc 2003) (review of evidence not viewed in favor of an award; consider the whole record)
  • Guccione v. Ray's Tree Service, 302 S.W.3d 252 (Mo.App. 2010) (unemployment act construed to favor disallowance only for misconduct with culpable conduct)
  • Williams v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Shared Servs., LLC, 297 S.W.3d 139 (Mo.App. 2009) (misconduct requires culpability or intent; not mere work-rule violation)
  • Ahearn v. Lewis Cafe, Inc., 308 S.W.3d 294 (Mo.App. 2010) (negligence without willful intent does not equal misconduct)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wooden v. Division of Employment Security
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 24, 2011
Citation: 341 S.W.3d 770
Docket Number: WD 72856
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.