History
  • No items yet
midpage
Woodard v. Cassens Transport Co.
2012 Ohio 4015
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Cassens employed Woodard as an over‑the‑road car hauler; he traveled extensively and stayed in hotels using a Cassens/CLC lodging program.
  • Cassens’ CBA required lodging during federally mandated rest periods and designated lodging; Cassens paid lodging and related costs but not meals or other incidental expenses.
  • Woodard stayed at a hotel in Lafayette, Indiana after a late-day delay and used a CLC card to pay for the room while awaiting a backhaul load.
  • Cassens instructed Woodard to stay overnight to pick up a backhaul load, extending the trip and keeping him away from his home terminal.
  • Woodard slipped and fell in a hotel bathroom while off‑duty en route to the next load, sustaining an acute left knee sprain.
  • Industrial Commission and trial court initially found Woodard entitled to workers’ compensation; Cassens challenged, leading to de novo review in the trial court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Woodard’s injury occurred in the course of and arising out of employment Woodard (Woodard) was traveling for work and injured while performing employment duties while staying at an employer-approved hotel. Woodard’s injury occurred during a personal, off‑duty bathroom visit with no sufficient nexus to employment. Not compensable; injury not arising out of employment; traveling employee status does not automatically prevail.

Key Cases Cited

  • Fisher v. Mayfield, 49 Ohio St.3d 275 (1990) (two-prong test: in the course of and arising out of employment; liberal construction in employee’s favor)
  • Lord v. Daugherty, 66 Ohio St.2d 441 (1981) (factors for causal connection: proximity, control, and employer benefit)
  • Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc., 81 Ohio St.3d 117 (1998) (activity must be related to employment; nexus analysis)
  • Elsass v. Commercial Carriers, Inc., 73 Ohio App.3d 112 (1992) (off-duty status not dispositive; proximity/time/place/purpose analysis)
  • Jones v. USF Holland, Inc., 2011-Ohio-2368 (2011) (traveling employee; hotel bathroom injury not always arising out of employment; court weights Lord factors)
  • Griffith v. City of Miamisburg, 2008-Ohio-6611 (2008) (employee on work-related trip; employer control and benefit considerations; flexibility in analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Woodard v. Cassens Transport Co.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 4, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 4015
Docket Number: 14-11-22
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.