Wood v. People
255 P.3d 1136
| Colo. | 2011Background
- In 2006, Wood was convicted of manslaughter for fatally shooting a person during a drug transaction in his apartment.
- Wood previously moved pretrial for immunity under the make-my-day statute, § 18-1-704.5, which the trial court denied.
- On direct appeal, Wood challenged the pretrial denial of immunity; the court of appeals declined to review the pretrial order.
- Colorado Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether a pretrial denial of immunity is reviewable on appeal after trial.
- The statute provides facial immunity if certain factual conditions are met, potentially justifying pretrial dismissal; Guenther clarified the nature of make-my-day immunity as conditional immunity.
- The Court held that pretrial immunity rulings are not reviewable on appeal after trial, and review must occur under C.A.R. 21 before trial.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether pretrial denial of immunity is reviewable on appeal after trial | Wood contends denial implicates jurisdiction and is reviewable anytime | People argues no appellate review after trial; review available via CAR 21 pretrial | Not reviewable on appeal after trial |
| Whether the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear immunity | Immunity precludes prosecution and affects jurisdiction | Jurisdiction exists; make-my-day immunity is not jurisdiction-stripping | Trial court had subject matter jurisdiction; denial not a jurisdictional defect |
| Whether pretrial immunity is analogous to a preliminary hearing and thus not final | Pretrial ruling is final in effect and should be reviewable | Pretrial ruling is nonfinal and moot after trial; review should occur pretrial | Pretrial immunity ruling is like a preliminary ruling and not final post-trial |
| What is the proper avenue for review of a pretrial immunity denial | Immediate or post-trial review should be available | Review should occur under C.A.R. 21 before trial; post-trial review is inappropriate | Review must be sought under C.A.R. 21 before trial; post-trial appeal is not proper |
Key Cases Cited
- Guenther, 740 P.2d 971 (Colo. 1987) (immunity under make-my-day is conditional immunity; supports pretrial dismissal)
- Janes, 962 P.2d 315 (Colo. App. 1998) (pretrial immunity issues discussed; not explicit on appealability)
- McMurtry, 122 P.3d 237 (Colo. 2005) (distinguished subject matter jurisdiction from general jurisdiction; speedy trial dismissal not divesting jurisdiction)
- Nichelson, 219 P.3d 1064 (Colo. 2009) (probable cause at preliminary hearing moot after conviction; parallels to make-my-day review post-trial)
- Paul, 105 P.3d 628 (Colo. 2005) (pretrial review available under CAR 21 to avoid delaying prosecution)
- Kuypers, 188 Colo. 332, 534 P.2d 1204 (Colo. 1975) (CAR 21 review appropriate for preliminary hearing determinations)
- E.J.R. v. Dist. Court, 892 P.2d 222 (Colo. 1995) (review principles for nonfinal orders; context for pretrial rulings)
