Wingate v. State
296 Ga. 21
| Ga. | 2014Background
- Wingate was convicted in Bibb County for malice murder and armed robbery of his godfather, Michael Wilkins.
- A Macon trip on Jan 23, 2010, with co-defendants culminated in Wilkins’s death and money taking.
- Witnesses testified Wingate and co-defendants talked about taking money; Wingate returned with cash after the visit.
- Police found Wilkins dead Jan 25; the scene showed limited forced entry, cash largely untouched, but a moved mattress and open safe.
- Evidence included gun-related items (cartridge and shell casings), possession of a semi-automatic gun, and Wingate’s proximity to Wilkins’s home based on calls and GPS.
- Wingate was later arrested on a marijuana charge; $1,817 was found on him five days after the Macon trip, leading to a suppression dispute.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence to support murder and robbery convictions | Wingate argues the evidence is largely circumstantial and his relationship with Wilkins negates intent. | State asserts the jury could reasonably infer guilt from direct and circumstantial evidence, including money transfer and getaway. | Evidence was sufficient to support convictions. |
| Whether the $1,817 found at school should have been admitted | Wingate contends the money was fruit of an unlawful seizure and must be suppressed. | State argues the money was admissible as a seizure incident to a lawful arrest or abandonment. | Trial court erred in not suppressing the money; however, error deemed harmless. |
| Whether the handcuffing at the school transformed the encounter into a seizure warranting suppression | Wingate contends handcuffs made him seized when left unattended, tainting the subsequent search. | State contends handcuffs did not convert the encounter into a seizure; authorities acted appropriately for safety. | Wingate was unlawfully detained when left handcuffed; subsequent search tainted, but harmless error. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel for not calling Milton Brooks | Brooks’s testimony could have implicated an unknown vehicle driver seen near Wilkins’s truck. | Counsel’s failure to pursue Brooks was an oversight without prejudice to outcome. | No reasonable probability the outcome would change; claim fails. |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. Supreme Court 1979) (sufficiency standard for criminal conviction)
- Vega v. State, 285 Ga. 32 (Ga. 2009) (credibility and conflicts in witness testimony; close relationships do not negate guilt)
- Ramirez v. State, 279 Ga. 569 (Ga. 2005) (harmless error review for Fourth Amendment violations)
- State v. Alexander, 245 Ga. App. 666 (Ga. App. 2000) (fruits of an unlawful arrest not admissible)
- Edwards v. State, 239 Ga. App. 44 (Ga. App. 1999) (abandoned property doctrine; coercive abandonment can justify suppression)
- Jones v. State, 126 Ga. App. 841 (Ga. App. 1972) (fruits of an unlawful search cannot be used as basis for arrest)
- Bolden v. State, 278 Ga. 459 (Ga. 2004) (handcuffs during noncustodial encounter; not decisive here)
- Smith v. State, 281 Ga. 185 (Ga. 2006) (handcuffed during transport; no unlawful seizure in that context)
- Stringer v. State, 285 Ga. 842 (Ga. 2009) (handcuffs may be permissible in investigatory stop under certain circumstances)
- In re D.H., 285 Ga. 51 (Ga. 2009) (encounters with police and need for reasonable suspicion)
- Stafford v. State, 284 Ga. 773 (Ga. 2008) (second-tier stop requires reasonable suspicion)
- Hunter v. Lee, 244 Ga. App. 488 (Ga. App. 2000) (dicta on detaining suspects at gunpoint outside search area)
- State v. Fisher, 293 Ga. App. 228 (Ga. App. 2008) (seizure analysis in appellate context)
