Windward Bora LLC v. Jain
1:18-cv-01844
E.D.N.YMay 19, 2025Background
- Windward Bora LLC filed a foreclosure action in federal court, asserting diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2).
- Plaintiff alleged it was an LLC whose sole member, Yonel Devico, was a Moroccan citizen residing in Florida as a non-permanent resident at the time of filing.
- Key defendants were Divya Jain (U.S. citizen, allegedly domiciled in New York or Florida) and Fannie Mae (DC corporation).
- PCN LLC was substituted for Fannie Mae, and after a lengthy pause for a related state court action and unsuccessful mediation, PCN questioned whether complete diversity existed at filing.
- Plaintiff submitted documents to prove Devico's non-citizen, non-permanent resident status at the relevant time, but PCN challenged the authenticity of those documents.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence of Diversity Jurisdiction | Devico was a Moroccan citizen, not a U.S. permanent resident at filing—supports diversity. | Devico and/or Jain may have been Florida residents, defeating diversity. | Plaintiff must authenticate Devico's documents to prove citizenship at filing. |
| Relevance of Substituted Defendant's Citizenship | Only citizenship at filing matters; PCN’s later addition is irrelevant. | None directly; raised jurisdictional issue post-filings. | Citizenship of current parties at filing controls. |
| Authentication of Citizenship Documents | Submitted passports, visa, green card, and declaration evidencing Devico's status. | Documents are incomplete, unauthenticated, and inadmissible. | Plaintiff failed to authenticate most documents; must allow inspection/discovery. |
| Remedy for Jurisdictional Uncertainty | No explicit remedy requested; implied that the issue is satisfied by provided evidence. | Requested limited discovery to verify document authenticity. | Allows document inspection and limited discovery; possible cost shifting if further discovery is required. |
Key Cases Cited
- Herrick Co. v. SCS Commc’ns, Inc., 251 F.3d 315 (case establishing burden to prove diversity jurisdiction)
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826 (explains diversity under § 1332(a)(2) requires foreign citizenship, not merely residency)
- Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc., 498 U.S. 426 (diversity assessed at time of filing, not affected by subsequent changes)
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (explains citizenship and domicile requirements for diversity jurisdiction)
- Pittsburgh, C. & St. L.R. Co. v. Ramsey, 89 U.S. 322 (facts, not party agreement, establish jurisdiction)
- Bayerische Landesbank v. Aladdin Cap. Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42 (LLC's citizenship based on each member's citizenship)
