302 Ga. 321
Ga.2017Background
- On July 29, 2014, William Leroy Wimberly (appellant) was involved in an altercation at Josh and Brittney’s home that culminated in the death of Christopher Strickland (the victim).
- Earlier, Wimberly had threatened to kill Josh over disciplining Wimberly’s granddaughter; he arrived at the home intoxicated and a fight ensued during which a pocket knife was produced and Wimberly was ejected.
- Wimberly returned in a truck; after a porch confrontation the victim stood between Josh and Wimberly. Wimberly had his hands behind his back, then produced a handgun. A struggle occurred; the victim ended up on the ground with a single gunshot wound to the chest fired at arm’s length.
- Josh wrestled control of the gun, then shot Wimberly; Josh later told others the victim said Wimberly shot him. The victim died at the scene.
- At an August 2015 bench trial Wimberly was convicted of felony murder, aggravated assault, and firearm possession during a felony; sentenced to life plus five years (aggravated assault count merged). Wimberly appealed asserting insufficient evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, and entitlement to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.
Issues
| Issue | Wimberly's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence to prove Wimberly fired the fatal shot | Josh didn’t see Wimberly fire; multiple people were struggling over the gun so identity of shooter was uncertain | Evidence (witness testimony, struggle over gun, gun fired at arm’s length into victim’s chest, victim’s statement that Wimberly shot him) supports finding Wimberly fired the shot | Affirmed — evidence sufficient for trier of fact to conclude Wimberly fired the shot (Jackson standard) |
| Ineffective assistance for failing to call four trial witnesses | Counsel omitted convenience-store witnesses, a driver/passenger witness, and Wimberly’s father whose testimony would undermine prosecution narrative | Counsel’s decisions on witness selection were strategic and reasonable; testimony of those witnesses was cumulative, equivocal, or would not likely change outcome | Affirmed — no deficient performance or prejudice shown (Strickland standard) |
| Ineffective assistance for not objecting to testimony about prior threats (404(b) notice) | Such prior-threat testimony was inadmissible 404(b) evidence without proper notice | The evidence was intrinsic/inextricably intertwined with the charged conduct and therefore admissible without 404(b) notice; probative value not substantially outweighed by prejudice | Affirmed — no counsel error in failing to object |
| New trial based on post‑trial testimony that Josh confessed to shooting his brother | Witness reported Josh said he shot his brother and thought he shot “old Leroy”; Wimberly argued this was new, material evidence that would change the verdict | The alleged post‑trial statement, even if credited, would only serve to impeach Josh’s credibility and would not meet Timberlake’s sixth requirement (cannot be solely impeaching) | Affirmed — motion for new trial properly denied because the evidence was only impeaching (Timberlake factors) |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for sufficiency of evidence)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (two‑part test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
- Timberlake v. State, 246 Ga. 488 (requirements for new trial based on newly discovered evidence)
- Dougherty v. State, 341 Ga. App. 120 (appellate review standard on bench trial)
- Dunn v. State, 291 Ga. 551 (reciting Strickland standard)
- McDuffie v. State, 298 Ga. 112 (trial counsel’s witness‑calling is strategic)
- Washington v. State, 294 Ga. 560 (strategic decisions not per se deficient)
- Clements v. State, 301 Ga. 267 (presumption that counsel’s choices are strategic)
- Daughtry v. State, 296 Ga. 849 (prejudice inquiry under Strickland)
- Brewner v. State, 302 Ga. 6 (intrinsic evidence and prejudice balancing)
- Chance v. State, 291 Ga. 241 (newly discovered evidence that only impeaches is insufficient)
- Brooks v. State, 298 Ga. 722 (definition of intrinsic/inextricably intertwined evidence)