History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
124 A.3d 767
| Pa. Commw. Ct. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Wilson was sentenced to concurrent terms with original maximum date Feb. 27, 2016; released on parole Feb. 13, 2013, owing 1,109 days of backtime.
  • Arrested Oct. 25, 2013 on new felony drug charges; detained on secured bail and a Board detainer pending disposition.
  • Pleaded guilty to new felonies on July 1, 2014; trial court sentenced him to concurrent 16–60 month terms with 220 days credit; trial court discharged him to the DOC on July 8, 2014; he was transferred to SCI-Graterford on July 22, 2014.
  • Wilson waived a parole revocation hearing on Aug. 6, 2014; hearing examiner and a panel member signed the recommitment Hearing Report on Aug. 26 and Sept. 19, 2014, respectively.
  • The Board recommitted Wilson as a convicted parole violator for 24 months backtime and set a new parole-violation maximum date of Oct. 2, 2017, computed by adding 1,109 days to Sept. 19, 2014 (date of second signature).
  • Wilson administratively appealed, arguing his backtime should be computed from either July 8, 2014 (court discharge) or July 22, 2014 (transfer to SCI), not Sept. 19, 2014.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Proper start date to compute parole-violation backtime Wilson: backtime should start on July 8, 2014 (court discharge) or July 22, 2014 (transfer to SCI) Board: backtime begins when Board revokes parole / obtains requisite panel signature (Sept. 19, 2014) Held for Board: compute from date Board obtained required signature (Sept. 19, 2014)
Application of time-in-custody credit between new sentence and revocation Wilson: time in county custody after conviction should count toward parole-violation backtime Board: custody prior to revocation is applied to new sentence; backtime begins at revocation Held for Board: custody before revocation applies to new sentence; backtime begins at revocation per Campbell and progeny

Key Cases Cited

  • Campbell v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 409 A.2d 980 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1980) (backtime for convicted parole violator computed from date parole is revoked)
  • Hill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 683 A.2d 699 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996) (administrative-review scope and application of Campbell)
  • Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 654 A.2d 235 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1994) (time in custody before revocation applies to new sentence)
  • Richmond v. Commonwealth, 402 A.2d 1134 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1979) (remainder of original sentence becomes due only upon parole revocation)

Decision: Board affirmed; new parole-violation maximum date correctly computed from Sept. 19, 2014.

Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 11, 2015
Citation: 124 A.3d 767
Docket Number: 329 C.D. 2015
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.