History
  • No items yet
midpage
91 So. 3d 56
Ala. Civ. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Divorce judgment (1998, Missouri issuing state) awarded father custody and limited mother’s support obligations to uninsured medical/dental expenses.
  • 2005 Alabama action sought modification of custody and acceptance of Missouri dissolution as Alabama decree; 2006 modification judgment issued.
  • 2009 father filed Petition for Rule Nisi and Modification alleging mother failed to pay medical/dental expenses and seeking child support for youngest child.
  • Trial court sua sponte questioned UIFSA-based subject-matter jurisdiction, reviewing whether divorce judgment had been properly registered under UIFSA.
  • Trial court dismissed the 2009 action in 2011 for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and vacated the 2006 modification judgment; father appealed.
  • Alabama appellate courtAffirmed dismissal, held lack of registration deprived jurisdiction and collateral attack otherwise permitted; no error in vacating 2006 modification.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether mother could collaterally attack the 2006 modification Williams Williams Yes; collateral attack permitted on lack of jurisdiction
Whether trial court had evidence to find lack of subject-matter jurisdiction Williams Williams Yes; records show lack of proper registration
Must UIFSA registration occur to modify foreign child-support order Williams Williams Registration required; court lacked jurisdiction without it
Does nonregistration foreclose jurisdiction even if parties reside out of issuing state Williams Williams Yes; bright-line rule requiring registration

Key Cases Cited

  • Walker v. Blackwell, 800 So.2d 582 (Ala. 2001) (collateral attack possible where lack of subject-matter jurisdiction shown)
  • Reneke v. Reneke, 897 So.2d 1101 (Ala.Civ.App. 2003) (judgments regular on face presumptively valid on collateral attack)
  • Kaufman v. Kaufman, 934 So.2d 1073 (Ala.Civ.App. 2005) (void judgments may be set aside for lack of jurisdiction)
  • Alves v. Board of Educ. for Guntersville, 922 So.2d 129 (Ala.Civ.App. 2005) (collateral attack permitted for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction)
  • Mathews v. Mathews, 244 S.W.3d 660 (Ark. 2006) ( UIFSA registration may govern modification where parties reside in state)
  • J.B. v. Cleburne Cnty. Dep’t of Human Res., 992 So.2d 34 (Ala.Civ.App. 2008) (record-specific limitations on judicial notice in appeals)
  • S.A.T. v. E.D., 972 So.2d 804 (Ala.Civ.App. 2007) ( UIFSA-related modification and registration considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Williams
Court Name: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Feb 24, 2012
Citations: 91 So. 3d 56; 2012 WL 593281; 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 48; 2100944
Docket Number: 2100944
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Civ. App.
Log In