History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Univ. of Akron
2016 Ohio 7209
| Ohio Ct. Cl. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Raymond Williams alleged a JAR Arena seat collapsed beneath him during a University of Akron (UA) men’s basketball game on November 16, 2015, injuring his lower back, right hip, and right knee.
  • Williams claimed $5,265 in medical bills and sought $10,000 total for medical expenses and pain and suffering; he had no insurance for the injury.
  • UA employees (an usher and Manager of Operations and Events Elizabeth Pannucci) responded; Williams said the seat bottom dropped but he caught himself on the armrests, declined medical treatment and did not complete an incident report; UA staff completed one per protocol.
  • UA’s investigation showed Williams held a general-admission bleacher ticket, not the reserved seat he attempted to use.
  • UA submitted affidavits and evidence that it conducts routine external inspections (most recently June 11, 2015) and regular visual checks before events; no notice of seat defects was shown.
  • The court found Williams failed to prove UA breached its duty of ordinary care or that any breach caused his injuries and denied the claim.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether UA breached duty of ordinary care to an invitee by failing to maintain safe seating Williams: the seat broke under him causing injury UA: conducted regular inspections, had no notice of defects, and corrected issues when identified Court: Williams failed to show UA breached its duty
Whether plaintiff proved causation between seat defect and injuries Williams: seat collapse caused his back/hip/knee injuries UA: no evidence of preexisting defect or notice; Williams declined treatment and did not report fall Court: insufficient evidence that a defect caused the injuries
Whether UA had actual or constructive notice of seat defect Williams: implied that UA should be responsible for seat failure UA: routine external inspections and event visual checks showed no defects; no patron reports about that seat prior Court: UA had no notice; plaintiff did not show UA should have known of defect
Whether plaintiff’s status/ticket affects duty or recovery Williams: attended game as an invitee and seeks recovery UA: plaintiff attempted to sit in reserved seat but held general-admission ticket (bleacher seating) Court: treated plaintiff as an invitee but still found no breach or causation

Key Cases Cited

  • Mussivand v. David, 45 Ohio St.3d 314, 544 N.E.2d 265 (1989) (elements required to establish negligence)
  • Jeffers v. Olexo, 43 Ohio St.3d 140, 539 N.E.2d 614 (1989) (absence of any negligence element defeats claim)
  • Light v. Ohio Univ., 28 Ohio St.3d 66, 502 N.E.2d 611 (1986) (invitee status and owner’s duty to exercise ordinary care to maintain safe premises)
  • Baldauf v. Kent State Univ., 49 Ohio App.3d 46, 550 N.E.2d 517 (10th Dist. 1988) (owner not insurer against all risks; duty balanced against risk exposure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Univ. of Akron
Court Name: Ohio Court of Claims
Date Published: Aug 18, 2016
Citation: 2016 Ohio 7209
Docket Number: 2016-00199-AD
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. Cl.