History
  • No items yet
midpage
126 So. 3d 992
Miss. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Williams was indicted for burglary of a dwelling (retired one count), burglary with enhanced punishment, and aggravated assault with enhanced punishment based on the victim being over 65.
  • On November 10, 2010, Williams signed a sworn plea petition and entered open guilty pleas to the burglary (enhanced) and aggravated assault (enhanced); he acknowledged giving a videotaped confession.
  • Sentenced December 16, 2010: 25 years for burglary and an enhanced, consecutive 40-year term for aggravated assault.
  • Williams filed a first PCR in August 2012 (dismissed on the merits) and a second PCR in January 2013; the circuit court dismissed the second as a successive writ under the UP-CCRA.
  • On appeal Williams challenged voluntariness of his confession/pleas, ineffective assistance of counsel, insufficiency of evidence for aggravated assault, and that the 40-year sentence was illegal.

Issues

Issue Williams' Argument State's Argument Held
Voluntariness of video confession and guilty pleas Confession and pleas coerced by false promises, prolonged interrogation, and deprivation Sworn plea petition and in-court statements show pleas/confession were voluntary; bare allegations insufficient Court rejected Williams' claim; pleas/confession found voluntary and intelligent
Ineffective assistance of counsel Counsel failed to investigate interrogation conditions and victim statements Record lacks evidentiary support; strategic decisions presumed reasonable; bare affidavit insufficient Claim fails for lack of proof under Strickland; waived except as pleaded and not shown
Sufficiency of evidence for aggravated assault (97-3-7(2)(a)) No weapon, only blows; injuries not serious — at most simple assault Investigative report and victim testimony show repeated blows, fractures, permanent injury; plea waived evidentiary challenges Court holds evidence (and plea) support aggravated assault; sufficiency challenge waived by plea
Legality of 40-year enhanced sentence 40 years exceeds §97-3-7(2) maximum of 30 years for victim 65+ Indictment and sentencing relied on §97-3-7(2)(a) (20-year max) with elderly-enhancement statutes that permit doubling; 40 years authorized Sentence not illegal: 20-year base doubled by enhancement statutes to 40 years is authorized

Key Cases Cited

  • Boyd v. State, 65 So.3d 358 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011) (standard of review for PCR denials)
  • Brooks v. State, 573 So.2d 1350 (Miss. 1990) (plea waives nonjurisdictional defects; bare allegations insufficient in PCR)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Vielee v. State, 653 So.2d 920 (Miss. 1995) (affidavit-only ineffective-assistance claims are insufficient in PCR)
  • Ward v. State, 879 So.2d 452 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003) (sworn plea petitions can be used to discredit post-plea claims)
  • Bright v. State, 986 So.2d 1042 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) (weapon not required to support aggravated assault where conduct likely to produce serious injury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Dec 3, 2013
Citations: 126 So. 3d 992; 2013 Miss. App. LEXIS 825; 2013 WL 6231802; No. 2013-CP-00199-COA
Docket Number: No. 2013-CP-00199-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    Williams v. State, 126 So. 3d 992