midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
225 So. 3d 1258
Miss. Ct. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • In December 2006 William S. Ashwell waived indictment and pled guilty to burglary of an inhabited dwelling and escape by bills of information; separate guilty-plea petitions were filed and the trial court accepted both pleas.
  • The court sentenced Ashwell to 15 years for burglary (with conditional suspension and placement in ISP contingent on program completion) and 5 concurrent years for escape; later amended the burglary order when Ashwell completed prerequisites and placed him into ISP and post-release supervision.
  • Ashwell violated post-release supervision; revocation proceedings occurred after he waived revocation hearings.
  • In August 2013 Ashwell filed a pro se post-conviction relief (PCR) motion claiming the circuit court lacked jurisdiction because the criminal dockets did not contain filed bills of information for the 2006 pleas.
  • The State conceded no bills of information were in the docket but submitted prosecutor affidavit, the waivers, guilty-plea petitions, and transcript excerpts showing the parties and court proceeded as if bills of information existed; the circuit court denied PCR and Ashwell appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether absence of a filed bill of information automatically voids convictions Ashwell: No bill of information was filed in the docket, so trial court lacked jurisdiction and convictions must be vacated State: Though not filed in the docket, waivers, guilty-plea petitions, transcript, and prosecutor affidavit show a bill of information existed and court acquired jurisdiction Court: No automatic reversal; trial court properly found a bill existed based on waiver, petitions, transcript, and affidavit; PCR denial affirmed
Whether plea was involuntary because waiver omitted offense date Ashwell: Omission of the date made the waiver and plea involuntary State: Plea and waiver issues were waived by pleading guilty and by failure to timely raise defect Court: Claim is procedurally barred; waiver and guilty plea forfeited the challenge
Applicability to escape conviction (consolidated appeal) Ashwell: Same defect (no filed bill) invalidates escape plea State: Same evidence shows a bill of information existed for escape; procedural bars apply Court: Same analysis applies; circuit court discretion to find bill existed; claim barred where applicable
Standard for relief on PCR factual findings Ashwell: Circuit court erred in relying on other documents to infer a bill existed State: Court may consider surrounding documents and affidavits; appellant bears burden by preponderance Court: Appellate review defers to circuit court on factual findings absent clear error; no clear error here

Key Cases Cited

  • Edmondson v. State, 17 So. 3d 591 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009) (standard of review for PCR denial)
  • Wilkerson v. State, 89 So. 3d 610 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011) (burden to prove entitlement to PCR relief)
  • Jefferson v. State, 556 So. 2d 1016 (Miss. 1989) (guilty plea does not waive subject-matter jurisdiction)
  • Rhodes v. State, 335 So. 2d 907 (Miss. 1976) (court may acquire jurisdiction when accused is arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by that court)
  • Berry v. State, 19 So. 3d 137 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009) (properly executed waiver of indictment vests trial court with authority over felony)
  • State v. Hart, 80 So. 3d 25 (La. Ct. App. 2011) (missing bill of information may be harmless where defendant waived formal reading and was aware of charges)
  • Black v. State, 806 So. 2d 1162 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002) (procedural waiver of defects in charging documents by pleading guilty)
  • Kelly v. State, 797 So. 2d 1003 (Miss. 2001) (defective charging document claims waived if not raised within statutory time)
  • Blount v. State, 126 So. 3d 927 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013) (separate PCR required for each conviction)
  • Ivory v. State, 999 So. 2d 420 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) (limitations on suspending portion of sentence conditioned on future events)
  • Johnson v. State, 77 So. 3d 1152 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012) (discussion of limits on deferring suspension of sentence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: William Scott Ashwell v. State of Mississippi
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Jun 7, 2016
Citations: 225 So. 3d 1258; 2016 WL 3154003; 2015-CA-00023-COA, 2015-CA-00626-COA
Docket Number: 2015-CA-00023-COA, 2015-CA-00626-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In