William Prentice Cooper, III v. Commissioner
136 T.C. No. 30
Tax Ct.2011Background
- Cooper filed two Form 211 whistleblower claims in 2008 with the IRS regarding alleged estate and generation-skipping tax underpayments related to Ms. Eweson’s estate and trusts.
- Whistleblower Office notified Cooper that the information would be used to determine whether to investigate, and that he would be informed at conclusion whether an award would be paid.
- IRS ultimately concluded that no administrative or judicial action would be taken against the taxpayer, and the Whistleblower Office sent letters denying awards for both claims.
- Cooper filed two petitions in the Tax Court seeking review of the denials, after which respondent moved for summary judgment.
- The Court previously held that the Whistleblower Office letters constitute award-determination notices, but the current issue is whether the Court may predetermine tax liability or reopen investigation.
- A whistleblower award requires both initiation of an administrative or judicial action and a subsequent collection of tax proceeds; here no proceeds were collected.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Court has jurisdiction to predetermine tax liability in a whistleblower case. | Cooper argues for a broader review of facts to detect underpayments. | Cooper contends the Court can open investigation and reopen case for underpayments. | No; Court lacks jurisdiction to predetermine tax liability. |
| Whether Cooper is entitled to a whistleblower award under 7623(b). | Award should follow from information leading to collection of proceeds. | No award since no administrative or judicial action or collection occurred. | No award; threshold requirements not met. |
| Whether the Secretary’s processing of whistleblower claims warrants summary judgment against Cooper. | Respondent did not properly investigate or apply the law to the merits. | Whistleblower awards require action and collection, which did not occur; summary judgment appropriate. | Summary judgment granted to respondent. |
Key Cases Cited
- Cooper v. Commissioner, 135 T.C. 70 (2010) (recognizes whistleblower award eligibility hinges on action and collection)
- Elec. Arts, Inc. v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 226 (2002) (summary judgment standards in Tax Court)
- FPL Group, Inc. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 73 (2001) (summary judgment framework and expedited resolution)
- Rauenhorst v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 157 (2002) (burden on moving party in summary adjudication)
- Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945) (summary judgment principles and need for no genuine issues)
