History
  • No items yet
midpage
658 F.3d 802
7th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Wilder sold 6600 acres to The Nature Conservancy; land became Emiquon Refuge under restoration efforts.
  • The sale included a warranty that there was no petroleum contamination, which Wilder allegedly breached.
  • The Conservancy sued Wilder in state court for breach of warranty and Wilder removed to federal court, where Conservancy obtained about $800,000 in damages.
  • Wilder then filed a companion federal suit against the local drainage district seeking indemnity for the Conservancy damages.
  • The drainage district stored petroleum on Wilder’s land and operated a pump house that affected drainage; Wilder argues district negligence caused the contamination.
  • Illinois law foreclose noncontractual indemnity here due to the economic-loss doctrine and other procedural/subrogation constraints, leading to affirmance of dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Wilder may recover noncontractual indemnity from the district for Conservancy damages. Wilder contends district negligence caused contamination; indemnity is appropriate. Indemnity for contract breach is not allowed; economic-loss doctrine applies; foreseeability and least-cost avoider concerns. No; not permitted under Illinois law and the economic-loss doctrine.

Key Cases Cited

  • Edwards v. Honeywell, Inc., 50 F.3d 484 (7th Cir. 1995) (unforeseeability limits tort-based indemnity and related defenses)
  • Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. United Plastics Group, Inc., 512 F.3d 953 (7th Cir. 2008) (Illinois foreseeability and economic-loss rationale applied)
  • Schulson v. D'Ancona & Pflaum LLC, 821 N.E.2d 643 (Ill. 2004) (limits on noncontractual indemnity in Illinois)
  • Talandis Construction Corp. v. Illinois Building Authority, 321 N.E.2d 154 (Ill. App. 1974) (examples of limits on indemnity and related doctrines)
  • Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293 (7th Cir. 1993) (subrogation concepts and limits in contract contexts)
  • Krueger Int'l, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co., 481 F.3d 993 (7th Cir. 2007) (economic considerations in indemnity and insurance contexts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wilder Corp. v. Thompson Drainage & Levee District
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Sep 27, 2011
Citations: 658 F.3d 802; 2011 WL 4448577; 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20310; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19655; 11-1185
Docket Number: 11-1185
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
Log In
    Wilder Corp. v. Thompson Drainage & Levee District, 658 F.3d 802