Wilcox v. State
309 Ga. App. 538
Ga. Ct. App.2011Background
- Wilcox convicted of rape, aggravated sodomy, and burglary; jury acquitted aggravated sexual battery.
- Victim, an elderly neighbor, identified Wilcox as the assailant at trial and to police.
- Prosecution presented corroborating testimony from officers, a nurse, and a physician.
- Defense challenged DNA on jeans; trial counsel stipulated to the blood's identity.
- Trial court denied motion for new trial; Wilcox filed an out-of-time appeal.
- Appellate court affirmed, holding no ineffective assistance and no error in trial decisions.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was there sufficient evidence identifying the defendant and supporting the verdict? | Wilcox | Wilcox | Yes; victim identification plus corroborating evidence supported the verdict. |
| Did counsel's stipulation to DNA on jeans constitute ineffective assistance? | Wilcox | Wilcox | No; strategy reasonable, consistent with trial theory. |
| Was failure to file a suppression motion due to exigent circumstances ineffective assistance? | Wilcox | Wilcox | No; exigent circumstances supported warrantless entry; counsel not deficient. |
| Was failure to object to hearsay by treating physician/nurse ineffective assistance? | Wilcox | Wilcox | No; prior consistent statements admissible; objection would be meritless. |
Key Cases Cited
- Sims v. State, 275 Ga.App. 836 (2005) (victim identification sufficient with corroboration under Jackson v. Virginia)
- Robison v. State, 277 Ga.App. 133 (2006) (ineffective assistance review standard; deference to trial court)
- James v. State, 294 Ga.App. 656 (2008) (exigent circumstances for warrantless entries; hot pursuit/ongoing danger)
- Thomas v. State, 306 Ga.App. 279 (2010) (meritless objections do not prove ineffectiveness)
- Watson v. State, 214 Ga. App. 650 (1994) (prior consistent statements admissible; hearsay issue meritless)