midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
81 So. 3d 599
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Whitehall was arrested Nov 4, 2008 after a countywide motorcycle pursuit.
  • Originally charged Dec 1, 2008 with fleeing to elude (3rd degree).
  • Speedy trial period was 175 days, ending Apr 27, 2009; notice of expiration filed May 11, 2009.
  • Superseding information filed May 18, 2009 amending to fleeing to elude with high speed or wanton disregard (2nd degree).
  • Trial court denied discharge, Whitehall was tried and convicted on the amended charge, and sentenced to 364 days’ county jail.
  • Court reversed the conviction on appeal, holding the State could not charge a new offense after speedy‑trial period expired and from the same episode; remanded for judgment on the original charge with credit for time served.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May the state amend after speedy trial to a new offense from the same episode? Whitehall State No; new offense invalid after speedy trial.
Did Whitehall waive speedy trial by accepting a trial date outside the period? Whitehall State No valid waiver proven; record insufficient.
Is remand proper to enter judgment on the original charge and credit time served? Whitehall State Yes; reverse and remand for original fleeing to elude.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Burnett, 870 So.2d 858 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (recapture window provides last chance to bring defendant to trial)
  • State v. Clifton, 905 So.2d 172 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (amending to a new charge after speedy-trial lapsed is prejudicial)
  • D.A., 939 So.2d 149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (new elements in amended offense = new offense for speedy-trial purposes)
  • Pezzo v. State, 903 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (recapture cannot be used to create new greater offense)
  • Saunders v. State, 436 So.2d 166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (affirmative acceptance of trial date constitutes waiver; mere silence does not)
  • State v. Swint, 464 So.2d 242 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (silence not waiver of speedy trial rights)
  • State v. Ansley, 349 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (waiver concepts in speedy-trial context)
  • Martin v. State, 449 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (record must show waiver; lack of documentation undermines waiver claim)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Whitehall v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 7, 2012
Citations: 81 So. 3d 599; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3674; 2012 WL 716039; 2D09-2871
Docket Number: 2D09-2871
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In