White v. White
296 Neb. 772
| Neb. | 2017Background
- Elizabeth White filed for dissolution in 2012; the district court appointed James McGough as attorney for the minor children and later ordered both spouses to pay his fees; McGough was not paid by White.
- White filed bankruptcy; her debts (including to McGough) were discharged. McGough then sought a finding that White was indigent so Douglas County would pay his fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358(1).
- The district court found White indigent and ordered Douglas County to pay McGough’s fees; Douglas County appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
- The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed, holding the district court abused its discretion in finding White indigent and vacated the order requiring the county to pay.
- After the Supreme Court mandate, McGough sought reimbursement from Douglas County for fees incurred defending that appeal; the district court ordered the county to pay $1,719.87, relying on a court-rule provision for court-appointed criminal appellate counsel.
- Douglas County appealed the district court’s postmandate order, arguing no statutory or inherent authority permitted the county to be charged for appellate fees in a civil dissolution matter where no responsible party is indigent.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court could order Douglas County to reimburse McGough for fees defending Douglas County’s appeal | McGough (and district court) argued appellate fees were recoverable because he remained appointed for the children and court rule language on appointed appellate counsel authorized a fee application | Douglas County argued no statute permits county payment for appointed counsel in a civil dissolution when responsible parties are not indigent; court rule cited applies to criminal appointed appellate counsel and fees are not allowable from county funds here | The Supreme Court reversed: no statutory or inherent authority allowed the county to be ordered to pay; § 42‑358(1) permits county payment only when a responsible party is indigent; rule cited was inapplicable |
Key Cases Cited
- Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604 (statutory interpretation is reviewed de novo)
- Wetovick v. County of Nance, 279 Neb. 773 (attorney fees recoverable only if statute or established procedure permits)
- State v. Joubert, 246 Neb. 287 (courts may award fees for vexatious or bad-faith litigation conduct)
- State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 222 Neb. 13 (inherent power to award fees in exceptional circumstances)
- Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 (uniform procedure for awarding attorney fees in dissolution cases)
- Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 (limits on counties’ power to spend public funds; such determinations belong to Legislature)
- Kovarik v. County of Banner, 192 Neb. 816 (judicial authority to order county to reimburse fees in fundamental criminal indigency contexts)
- Brackhan v. Brackhan, 3 Neb. App. 143 (county has standing to appeal orders requiring it to pay appointed counsel under § 42-358)
