White v. White
296 Neb. 772
| Neb. | 2017Background
- Elizabeth White filed for dissolution; the district court appointed James McGough as attorney for the minor children and later discharged him from that appointment.
- The district court ordered each spouse to pay $2,073.12 to McGough; White did not pay and later listed the debt in bankruptcy, which ultimately discharged her obligation.
- McGough moved the district court to find White indigent and to order Douglas County to pay his fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358(1); the district court did so.
- Douglas County intervened and appealed; the Nebraska Supreme Court reversed, holding White was not indigent and the county should not have been ordered to pay under § 42-358(1).
- After mandate, McGough sought $1,719.87 from Douglas County for fees incurred defending that appeal; the district court ordered the county to pay, relying on a court-rule provision for court-appointed criminal appellate counsel. Douglas County appealed that order.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court could order Douglas County to reimburse McGough for appellate fees incurred defending Douglas County's appeal | McGough contended the district court had authority to award appellate fees incurred by a court-appointed attorney for the children, relying on court rule language for appointed appellate counsel | Douglas County argued no statute or authority permits expenditure of public funds for appointed civil counsel when no responsible party is indigent; the county also argued procedural defects | Reversed: district court lacked authority. No statute authorizes county payment of appointed attorney fees in a dissolution case absent an indigent responsible party under § 42‑358(1); court rule governing criminal appointed appellate counsel does not apply to this civil context |
Key Cases Cited
- Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604 (statutory interpretation is a question of law)
- Wetovick v. County of Nance, 279 Neb. 773 (attorney fees recoverable only when statute or uniform procedure permits)
- Kovarik v. County of Banner, 192 Neb. 816 (county may be ordered to pay attorney fees in fundamental criminal indigency contexts)
- Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 (rules for county expenditures of public funds should be set by Legislature)
- Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 (recognition of uniform procedure for awarding attorney fees in dissolution cases)
- White v. White, 293 Neb. 439 (prior appeal holding White was not indigent; reversal of county-fee order)
- Brackhan v. Brackhan, 3 Neb. App. 143 (county has standing to appeal orders requiring it to pay appointed counsel fees)
