White v. White
296 Neb. 772
Neb.2017Background
- Elizabeth White filed for dissolution; the district court appointed James McGough as attorney for the minor children and later ordered the spouses each to pay McGough fees; White did not pay.
- White’s debt to McGough was later discharged in bankruptcy; McGough then sought a finding that White was indigent so Douglas County would be ordered to pay under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358(1).
- The district court found White indigent and ordered Douglas County to reimburse McGough; Douglas County appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
- The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed, holding the district court abused its discretion in finding White indigent and vacated the county payment order in White v. White.
- After mandate, McGough moved the district court for $1,719.87 in attorney fees for time spent defending Douglas County’s appeal; the district court ordered Douglas County to pay those appellate fees.
- Douglas County appealed that order; the Supreme Court reversed, holding no statute authorized county payment of appointed counsel’s appellate fees where no responsible party is indigent.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court could order Douglas County to pay McGough’s appellate fees | McGough: fees for defending the appeal are recoverable and tied to his court appointment; § 2-109(F) permits applying to appointing court post-mandate | Douglas County: no statutory authority to expend public funds here; § 42-358(1) authorizes county payment only if responsible party is indigent; court lacked power | Reversed: no statute permits county payment of appointed counsel’s fees in dissolution when no responsible party is indigent; district court erred |
Key Cases Cited
- Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604 (statutory interpretation reviewed de novo)
- Wetovick v. County of Nance, 279 Neb. 773 (attorney fees recoverable only when statute or uniform procedure allows)
- State v. Joubert, 246 Neb. 287 (courts may award fees for vexatious or bad-faith litigation conduct)
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 222 Neb. 13 (inherent power to award fees in extraordinary circumstances)
- Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 (uniform procedure exists for awarding attorney fees in dissolution cases)
- Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 (county powers strictly construed; public expenditures for defense matters are for Legislature)
- Kovarik v. County of Banner, 192 Neb. 816 (judiciary may order county to pay fees in fundamental criminal indigency contexts)
- White v. White, 293 Neb. 439 (prior reversal: district court abused discretion in finding White indigent)
