White v. White
296 Neb. 772
Neb.2017Background
- Elizabeth White sued for dissolution; the district court appointed James McGough as attorney for the minor children and later ordered the parties to pay his fees.
- White did not pay; after bankruptcy discharge, McGough moved under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358(1) to have Douglas County pay his fees, arguing White was indigent.
- The district court found White indigent and ordered Douglas County to pay; Douglas County appealed and this court reversed, holding White was not indigent.
- After mandate, McGough sought $1,719.87 from Douglas County for fees defending Douglas County’s appeal; the district court ordered the county to pay, relying on Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-109(F).
- Douglas County appealed the order requiring it to reimburse McGough for appellate work, arguing lack of statutory authority, procedural defects, and law-of-the-case grounds.
Issues
| Issue | McGough's Argument | Douglas County's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court could order the county to pay McGough’s fees for defending the county’s appeal | Fees for appellate work are compensable and the appointing court may order payment (relying on § 2-109(F) and appointment authority) | No statutory authority permits a county to pay appointed counsel in a civil dissolution when no responsible party is indigent; county lacks power absent statute | Reversed: court had no authority to order county to pay appellate fees where no responsible party was indigent |
| Whether § 42-358(1) authorizes county payment of appointed counsel’s fees when responsible party is not indigent | § 42-358 authorizes payment of costs by county for appointed counsel | § 42-358 allows county payment only if the responsible party is indigent; otherwise no public-fund expenditure authority | Held that § 42-358(1) permits county payment only when a responsible party is indigent |
Key Cases Cited
- Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604 (statutory interpretation standard of review)
- Wetovick v. County of Nance, 279 Neb. 773 (attorney fees recoverable only by statute or established procedure)
- Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 (uniform procedure for attorney fees in dissolution cases)
- Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 (rules for county expenditure of public funds should be set by Legislature)
- Kovarik v. County of Banner, 192 Neb. 816 (limited inherent judicial authority to require county payment in fundamental criminal indigency contexts)
- Brackhan v. Brackhan, 3 Neb. App. 143 (county has standing to appeal orders requiring it to pay appointed counsel)
- White v. White, 293 Neb. 439 (prior opinion reversing county-payment order where White was not indigent)
