White v. White
296 Neb. 772
| Neb. | 2017Background
- Elizabeth White filed for dissolution; the district court appointed James McGough as attorney for the minor children and later ordered the spouses to pay McGough fees; McGough sought enforcement after White did not pay.
- White’s debts (including to McGough) were discharged in bankruptcy; McGough then moved the district court to find White indigent and order Douglas County to pay the appointed-attorney fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358(1).
- The district court found White indigent and ordered Douglas County to pay McGough’s fees; Douglas County intervened and appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
- The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed, holding the district court abused its discretion in finding White indigent and vacated the order requiring the county to pay.
- After mandate, McGough sought $1,719.87 from Douglas County for fees incurred defending that appeal; the district court ordered Douglas County to pay, relying on Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-109(F).
- Douglas County appealed the order requiring it to reimburse McGough for appellate fees; the Nebraska Supreme Court reversed, holding no statutory authority allowed county payment where no responsible party is indigent.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court could order Douglas County to reimburse appointed attorney McGough for time/expenses in defending Douglas County’s appeal | McGough argued his appellate work was part of his appointment duties and § 2-109(F) and § 42-358(1) permitted recovery | Douglas County argued no statute authorized county payment for appointed-attorney fees in a civil dissolution when no responsible party is indigent; county lacks power absent legislative grant | Reversed: no statutory authority; § 42-358(1) permits county payment only when a responsible party is indigent, and none was here |
| Whether appellate rule § 2-109(F) authorized a post-mandate county reimbursement in a civil appointment context | McGough relied on the rule’s allowance for court-appointed criminal attorneys to apply for appellate fees | Douglas County argued § 2-109(F) applies to criminal appointments and does not create authority for county payment in civil dissolution matters | Held: § 2-109(F) inapplicable to grant county expenditure power for civil appointed counsel; rule did not supply statutory authority |
Key Cases Cited
- White v. White, 293 Neb. 439 (2016) (reversed district court finding of indigence and county payment order)
- Mathews v. Mathews, 267 Neb. 604 (Neb. 2004) (statutory interpretation is question of law)
- Guenzel-Handlos v. County of Lancaster, 265 Neb. 125 (Neb. 2003) (court should not create rules authorizing county expenditures; Legislature should)
- Kovarik v. County of Banner, 192 Neb. 816 (Neb. 1972) (judiciary’s narrow inherent authority to order county to pay fees in fundamental criminal indigency contexts)
- Wetovick v. County of Nance, 279 Neb. 773 (Neb. 2010) (attorney fees recoverable only when statute or uniform procedure permits)
- Brackhan v. Brackhan, 3 Neb. App. 143 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994) (county has standing to appeal orders requiring it to pay appointed-attorney fees)
