midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
2013 Ohio 1937
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Fred Ward’s will creates life estates; Virgil Ward obtains fiduciary duties as implied trustee over remainder interests.
  • Virgil sold the 240-acre Ward farm to the Bakers under terms he set, with $50,000 to reimburse his improvements and other distributions to his sisters.
  • Sisters and descendants sued to declare the sale void; trial court voided the conveyance.
  • Appellate court previously held Virgil owed fiduciary duties and remanded to determine authority under the will.
  • Trial court found a breach of fiduciary duty due to selling far below fair market value and voided the documents; remand for R.C. 5810.12(A) analysis.
  • Judgment: partly affirmed, partly reversed, remanded for further proceedings on remedies and applicability of R.C. 5810.12(A).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Authority under the power of sale limited by fiduciary duties Bakers allege no absolute discretion Virgil could sell under discretionary terms Virgil constrained by implied-trust duties; not absolute power
Sufficiency of consideration to distinguish sale from gift Sale involved money; no gift No statutory limit on consideration Court may consider adequate consideration; discussion appropriate
Will interpretation vs. testator’s intent Discretion language meaningless if limited Discretionary language stands Law-of-the-case limits re-litigation; consideration of duty relevant to intent
Remedy for breach of fiduciary duty Void sale proper remedy; allow restore Damages or other remedies possible Remand to resolve R.C. 5810.12(A) applicability and burden of proof
Admissibility of parol evidence about value Value evidence irrelevant to sale/gift Value evidence relevant to duty and terms Parol evidence properly admitted; relevant to duty and terms

Key Cases Cited

  • Johnson v. Johnson, 51 Ohio St. 446 (Ohio 1894) (life estate with power to sell subject to trust duties)
  • Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1 (Ohio 1984) (law of the case governs retrial issues)
  • FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Inks, 9th Dist. Nos. 25980, 26182 (Ohio 2012) (remand for unresolved burdens on trial court)
  • Stevens v. Natl. City Bank, 45 Ohio St.3d 276 (Ohio 1989) (trustee duty to exercise discretion in good faith)
  • Commerce & Industry Ins. Co. v. Toledo, 45 Ohio St.3d 96 (Ohio 1989) (breach of fiduciary duty questions of fact)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Weygandt v. Ward
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 13, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 1937; 12CA0004
Docket Number: 12CA0004
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In