History
  • No items yet
midpage
337 P.3d 853
Or. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff was serving prison sentences for multiple counts in Josephine County that, combined with a prior Marion County sentence, would end after 49 months under the initial calculations.
  • After Marion County’s 20-month sentence was vacated on remand in 2005, the Department recalculated the remaining Josephine County terms.
  • The Department’s prison-term analyst interpreted 'consecutive to all previously imposed sentences' to run consecutively to sentences imposed the same day, not just earlier sentences.
  • The department’s calculation would make plaintiff serve 49 months in Josephine County before release, longer than the plea agreement’s 36-month total.
  • Plaintiff objected; a PTA memo stated the department was bound by the written judgment and required an amended judgment to change terms.
  • In December 2005 plaintiff was released under the department’s calculation; in December 2007 he filed suit alleging negligence in calculation and false imprisonment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether discretionary immunity applies to false imprisonment claims Plaintiff argues immunity does not apply to intentional torts. Defendant argues ORS 30.265(6)(c) covers discretionary decisions for both negligence and intentional torts. Discretionary immunity may apply to intentional torts; case-by-case; PTA decision protected here.
Preservation of the PTA's duty to report issues about judgments Plaintiff contends the PTA should have notified a supervisor or court about interpretive problems. Defendant contends plaintiff failed to preserve this argument; relied on different pleadings. Plaintiff failed to preserve the supervisory-report argument; not reviewable on appeal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Disney-Marine Co., Inc. v. Webb, 47 Or App 985 (1980) (discretionary immunity applied to intentional torts)
  • Donahue v. Bowers/Steward, 19 Or App 50 (1974) (discretionary immunity applicable to intentional torts)
  • Sullivan v. State, 15 Or App 149 (1973) (discretionary immunity on false imprisonment)
  • Blankenship v. Smalley, 262 Or App 240 (2014) (preservation of issues on appeal)
  • Westfall v. Dept. of Corrections, 355 Or 144 (2014) (remand and discretionary-immunity analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Westfall v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Oct 8, 2014
Citations: 337 P.3d 853; 266 Or. App. 14; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1358; 07C23164; A140772
Docket Number: 07C23164; A140772
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    Westfall v. State, 337 P.3d 853