History
  • No items yet
midpage
358 S.W.3d 428
Tex. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Court reviews Henson v. Reddin in a conversion dispute over a polyurethane spraying machine mounted in a trailer; Henson owned half of Discount Industrial Coating, Inc.; Reddin purchased and installed parts (fusion gun, transfer pump, foam kit, hoses, etc.) to repair the machine for potential purchase; Henson moved the trailer away and did not return the parts; Reddin sued for conversion seeking recovery of the parts’ value; the county court at law awarded damages of $4,561.52 plus prejudgment interest and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law; Henson appeals asserting insufficiency of the evidence on both liability and damages.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there legally and factually sufficient evidence of conversion? Reddin shows Henson unlawfully controlled and refused return of property. Henson denies knowledge or intent to convert; no deal or unauthorized control. Yes; legally and factually sufficient evidence supports conversion.
Are damages of $4,561.52 legally and factually supported? Purchase price evidence establishes value; parts were destroyed soon after installation. Purchase price alone does not prove fair market value; depreciation or actual value required. Yes; damages supported under actual value or fair market value.

Key Cases Cited

  • Khorshid, Inc. v. Christian, 257 S.W.3d 748 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008) (defines elements of conversion and lack of innocence as a defense not available to avoid liability)
  • Burns v. Rochon, 190 S.W.3d 263 (Tex. App.—Hou. [1st Dist.] 2006) (discusses value measures and depreciation in damages for conversion)
  • Automek, Inc. v. Orandy, 105 S.W.3d 60 (Tex. App.—Hou. [1st Dist.] 2003) (sufficiency of evidence to support conversion judgment)
  • Wutke v. Yolton, 71 S.W.2d 549 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1934) (admissibility and method for determining actual value when FMV is unavailable)
  • Lee v. Dykes, 312 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. App.—Hou. [14th Dist.] 2010) (purchase price as starting point; depreciation and market value considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wesley Henson v. Allen Reddin
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 5, 2012
Citations: 358 S.W.3d 428; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 125; 2012 WL 42919; 02-11-00029-CV
Docket Number: 02-11-00029-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Wesley Henson v. Allen Reddin, 358 S.W.3d 428