History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wendell Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18723
4th Cir.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1982 Griffin was convicted in Maryland state court of murder and sentenced to life; state appeals and post-conviction efforts were unsuccessful and a federal habeas petition filed while incarcerated was denied.
  • In 2010–2011 Griffin obtained police records via a public-information request and alleged that detectives had withheld Brady material (photo arrays, witness statements, chain-of-custody issues, evidence pointing to another suspect).
  • A Maryland court conducted an evidentiary hearing in August 2011 and later Griffin’s sentence was modified to time served in May 2012; he was released and probation ended in December 2012.
  • Griffin then sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages for alleged Brady violations by police and prosecutors.
  • The district court dismissed the § 1983 suit under Heck v. Humphrey, reasoning that success on Griffin’s Brady claims would necessarily imply the invalidity of his still-standing conviction; Griffin appealed.
  • The Fourth Circuit affirmed, holding Heck bars § 1983 damages claims that necessarily imply the invalidity of a conviction unless the conviction has been invalidated or a narrow exception applies (which did not here).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Heck bars Griffin's § 1983 damages claims based on alleged Brady violations Griffin: Heck does not apply because he could not practicably seek federal habeas while in custody due to suppressed evidence; Wilson exception should allow his suit now that he is released Defendants: Heck bars the suit because success would necessarily imply invalidity of the conviction and Griffin’s conviction remains valid Held: Heck bars the § 1983 Brady claims; Griffin’s convictions have not been invalidated, so his damages suit is premature
Whether the Wilson/Covey “practicable habeas” exception applies Griffin: He lacked practical access to habeas while incarcerated because exculpatory material was withheld Defendants: Griffin had ample time (decades) and actually filed federal habeas while incarcerated; he failed to show lack of access Held: Exception does not apply — Griffin had opportunity and did file habeas; later discovery of evidence while still incarcerated did not show inability to file
Whether Griffin’s release from custody renders Heck inapplicable Griffin: Being released should allow his § 1983 claim to proceed Defendants: Heck applies regardless of current custody status; permitting suits after release would circumvent habeas restrictions Held: Release does not negate Heck; rule prevents waiting until after release to transform § 1983 into collateral post-conviction review
Whether the court decides the merits of the Brady allegations Griffin: Seeks adjudication of merits in § 1983 action Defendants: Procedural bar prevents reaching merits now Held: Court did not reach merits; decision is procedural — Griffin may pursue habeas or state remedies and may refile § 1983 if conviction is invalidated

Key Cases Cited

  • Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (prohibits § 1983 claims that would necessarily imply invalidity of conviction unless conviction has been invalidated)
  • Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (suppression of material, favorable evidence violates due process)
  • Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521 (§ 1983 may support DNA testing claims; distinguishes Brady claims because successful Brady claims necessarily undermine convictions)
  • Wilson v. Johnson, 535 F.3d 262 (4th Cir.) (narrow exception to Heck where petitioner could not practicably seek habeas while in custody)
  • Covey v. Assessor of Ohio County, 777 F.3d 186 (4th Cir.) (applies Wilson framework; exception limited to those who lacked practical access to habeas)
  • Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (habeas is the exclusive federal remedy for state prisoners seeking release)
  • Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (explains the favorable-termination requirement under Heck)
  • Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (discusses habeas intrusion on state sovereignty and deference to state proceedings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wendell Griffin v. Baltimore Police Department
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 27, 2015
Citation: 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18723
Docket Number: 14-1494
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.