History
  • No items yet
midpage
527 F. App'x 896
Fed. Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Yeh, pro se, petitions for review of the Board’s dismissal of her WPA IRA claim for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Yeh was hired as an IT Specialist at DISA on April 12, 2010 and terminated September 9, 2010 during probation for failure to demonstrate fitness.
  • Yeh filed an OSC complaint alleging various concerns; OSC found WPA claims meritless and advised Yeh about filing an IRA appeal.
  • Yeh filed a March 2011 IRA appeal; the Board issued an acknowledgment order requiring non-frivolous allegations of protected disclosures and contributing factor.
  • The Board dismissed Yeh’s IRA appeal for lack of jurisdiction in December 2011; the Board’s final order affirmed in July 2012, and Yeh appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Yeh raised non-frivolous WPA-protected disclosures establishing jurisdiction Yeh alleged chat-room misuse and timekeeping disclosures as protected Disclosures were conclusory and not shown to involve WPA-protected conduct No non-frivolous WPA-protected disclosures; no jurisdiction
Whether a contributing-factor link between disclosures and termination was established Disclosures contributed to the termination No sufficient evidence the disclosures influenced the termination Contributing-factor element not satisfied; jurisdiction lacked

Key Cases Cited

  • Lachance v. White, 174 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (reasonable-belief standard for protected disclosures)
  • Yunus v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 242 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (jurisdiction requires protected-disclosure plus contributing-factor)
  • Kahn v. Dep’t of Justice, 528 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (burden on board to show jurisdiction; non-frivolous allegations test)
  • Doyle v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 273 F. App’x 961 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (abuse of authority definition and weight of evidence)
  • Chambers v. Dep’t of Interior, 515 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (tests for gross mismanagement and gross waste of funds; substantiality)
  • Yost v. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 4 F. App’x 900 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (harmless-error framework for procedural notice)
  • Meeker v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 319 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (review standards for Board decisions on jurisdiction)
  • White v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 63 MSPR 90 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (definitions of mismanagement and proportionality in WPA context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Wen Chiann Yeh v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jun 27, 2013
Citations: 527 F. App'x 896; 2012-3216
Docket Number: 2012-3216
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
Log In
    Wen Chiann Yeh v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 527 F. App'x 896