History
  • No items yet
midpage
Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning Commission
128 Ohio St. 3d 471
| Ohio | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Welsh Development Co. and property owners sought review of Warren County Regional Planning Comm. decisions denying Phase I and approving Phase II subject to conditions.
  • They filed complaints and notices of appeal in the Warren County Court of Common Pleas with a praecipe for the clerk to serve the agency by certified mail; service occurred within 30 days after final orders.
  • WCRPC challenged exhaustion and argued failure to file notices of appeal with the agency under R.C. 2505.04, leading to dismissal in the trial court and on appeal.
  • Twelfth District rejected the broad Dudukovich-based approach, holding that service by the clerk of courts is not the equivalent of filing with the agency for purposes of R.C. 2505.04.
  • The Supreme Court granted discretionary review due to conflict with other districts and held that filing occurs when the clerk serves the agency with a copy of the notice of appeal and the agency receives it within 30 days, thereby perfecting the appeal.
  • The Court clarified the distinction between filing and service, emphasizing the clerk’s role as a delivery conduit and that timely notice to the agency satisfies R.C. 2505.04.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether clerk service of a copy of the notice of appeal to the agency satisfies R.C. 2505.04 if the agency receives it within 30 days. Welsh argues for broad Dudukovich interpretation: service to agency counts as filing if timely. WCRPC argues filing must be actual delivery to the agency; clerk service does not satisfy 2505.04. Yes; administrative appeal perfected if agency receives within 30 days.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dudukovich v. Lorain Metro. Hous. Auth., 58 Ohio St.2d 202 (Ohio 1979) (addresses timing and delivery for filing an administrative appeal)
  • Fulton v. State ex rel. Gen. Motors Corp., 130 Ohio St. 494 (1936) (definition of filing requires actual delivery)
  • Zanesville v. Rouse, 126 Ohio St.3d 1 (2010) (filing via delivery to court; clerk certification after receipt not required for filing)
  • McCruter v. Bureau of Employment Services Bd. of Review, 64 Ohio St.2d 277 (1980) (statutory appeal mechanics governed by cardinal rules; follow statute precisely)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning Commission
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 7, 2011
Citation: 128 Ohio St. 3d 471
Docket Number: 2010-0611 and 2010-0858
Court Abbreviation: Ohio