WELLS FARGO BANK, NA VS. DONALD D. COLLUCCI, JR.(F-16527-13, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-1948-15T3
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Jul 11, 2017Background
- Donald executed a $561,952 promissory note and both Donald and Veronica signed the mortgage on the marital home; Veronica did not sign the note.
- Donald defaulted on payments beginning January 2011; Wells Fargo sent Notices of Intent to Foreclose (NOI) to Donald at the property but did not serve Veronica or copy her.
- Wells Fargo filed a foreclosure complaint in May 2013; Veronica answered and later opposed summary judgment.
- Veronica moved to dismiss under R. 4:46-2, arguing the Fair Foreclosure Act (FFA), N.J.S.A. 2A:50-52 to -68, required that she (as a mortgagor) receive a NOI.
- The Chancery Division granted Wells Fargo summary judgment and later entered final judgment of foreclosure; Veronica appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the lender must send a FFA Notice of Intent to Foreclose to a mortgagor who did not sign the promissory note (a non-debtor mortgagor) | Lender satisfied FFA by sending NOI to the person obligated on the note (Donald) and had no statutory duty to serve Veronica because she is not a debtor | Veronica argued the FFA required notice to any mortgagor residing in the house and thus she was entitled to receive the NOI | The court held the FFA requires notice to the person shown on the lender's records as obligated to pay the loan (debtor); Veronica, not being a signatory/debtor, need not be sent the NOI; judgment affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Liquidation of Integrity Ins. Co., 193 N.J. 86 (2007) (standard for de novo review of statutory interpretation)
- Bank of N.Y. v. Laks, 422 N.J. Super. 201 (App. Div. 2011) (interpreting FFA notice obligations and defining debtor)
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Guillaume, 209 N.J. 449 (2012) (related appellate history addressing FFA issues)
