History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weissberger v. Myers
90 A.3d 730
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Contract in Jan 2006 to construct addition/renovations; Weissbergers designed, Contractors to follow design.
  • Contractors allegedly performed substandard work and deviated from plans; by Sep 2006 $40,000 paid, work incomplete, Contractors did not return.
  • June 2008 Weissbergers sued for breach, UTPCPL, and fraud; Contractors answered.
  • Aug 2010 Myers filed Chapter 7; Weissbergers pursued Adversary Complaint alleging non-dischargeability due to fraud.
  • Bankruptcy Court found debt nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A); Weissbergers sought partial SJ arguing res judicata/collateral estoppel.
  • Trial court denied motion for partial SJ; Weissbergers sought review; this appeal proceeds as review of denial of partial SJ.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether bankruptcy ruling affected trial court analysis Weissbergers contend bankruptcy analysis governs SJ. Myers contends distinct standards apply at state court. No reversible error; standard discussed but not dispositive.
Whether collateral estoppel/res judicata supports SJ on fraud, breach, UTPCPL Bankruptcy fraud finding precludes relitigation. Different burdens of proof; estoppel not applicable. Collateral estoppel not applicable; fraud burden differs; SJ denied.
Whether record supports SJ on fraud, breach, UTPCPL Fraud established; preponderance in bankruptcy translates to state court fraud. Record lacks clear and convincing fraud showing for state court; heavier burden. Record does not show no genuine issue of material fact; SJ denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Balent v. City of Wilkes-Barre, 542 Pa. 555 (Pa. 1995) (collateral estoppel framework; five elements)
  • In re Antonious, 358 B.R. 172 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.2006) (dischargeability burden; preponderance standard)
  • Pittsburgh Nat. Bank v. Larson, 352 Pa.Super. 250 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1986) (fraud burden is clear and convincing; heavier standard)
  • Rue v. K-Mart Corp., 552 Pa. 13 (Pa. 1998) (Restatement §28 considerations; collateral estoppel exceptions)
  • In re Stevenson, 40 A.3d 1212 (Pa. 2012) (federal judgments given full effect in state court)
  • Atiyeh v. Bear, 690 A.2d 1245 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997) (application of collateral estoppel to bankruptcy decisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Weissberger v. Myers
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 22, 2014
Citation: 90 A.3d 730
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.